RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

labarba/sciwrite

Default branch main · commit 8a57fa73 · scanned 6/4/2026, 2:02:34 AM

GitHub: 687 stars · 92 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface labarba/sciwrite, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Clarify README's opening to prevent miscategorization

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # SciWrite — Manuscript Writing Review

An Agent Skill that reviews scientific and engineering manuscripts for writing quality...
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    SciWrite is an AI Agent Skill for *reviewing* scientific and engineering manuscripts for writing quality, based on Dr. Kristin Sainani's methodology. It provides editorial passes on text, focusing on clarity and style, and is distinct from tools for reproducible document generation or LaTeX workflows.
  • hightopics#2
    Add relevant topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai-agent, scientific-writing, manuscript-review, writing-assistant, natural-language-processing, academic-writing, editorial-tool
  • mediumlicense#3
    Clarify existing license in README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## License

This project is released under [describe the actual license(s) present in the LICENSE file, e.g., a custom academic license, or a combination of licenses]. Please refer to the `LICENSE` file for full details.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface labarba/sciwrite
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
QuillBot
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. QuillBot · recommended 2×
  2. ProWritingAid · recommended 2×
  3. Hemingway Editor · recommended 2×
  4. Grammarly Business/Premium · recommended 1×
  5. DeepL Write · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can AI assist in refining the clarity of scientific and engineering manuscripts?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Grammarly Business/Premium
    2. DeepL Write
    3. QuillBot
    4. Trinka AI
    5. ChatGPT / GPT-4
    6. ProWritingAid
    7. Hemingway Editor

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named labarba/sciwrite. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools use AI to improve writing quality by identifying passive voice and clutter?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Grammarly Business
    2. ProWritingAid
    3. Hemingway Editor
    4. QuillBot
    5. Sapling AI
    6. Writer.com

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named labarba/sciwrite. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of labarba/sciwrite?
    pass
    AI named labarba/sciwrite explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts labarba/sciwrite in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named labarba/sciwrite explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo labarba/sciwrite solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named labarba/sciwrite explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of labarba/sciwrite. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/labarba/sciwrite.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/labarba/sciwrite)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/labarba/sciwrite"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/labarba/sciwrite.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

labarba/sciwrite — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite