RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

google-research/deduplicate-text-datasets

Default branch master · commit 4e9888ac · scanned 5/25/2026, 6:22:39 AM

GitHub: 1,272 stars · 129 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
47 /100
Critical
Category recall
1 / 2
Avg rank #2.0 when recommended
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface google-research/deduplicate-text-datasets, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highabout#1
    Add a concise 'About' description

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Code and scripts for ExactSubstr deduplication of large text datasets (e.g., C4, LM1B) to improve language model training efficiency and reduce memorization. Includes Rust implementation and Python analysis tools.
  • mediumreadme#2
    Clarify the specific deduplication method offered in the README's opening

    Why:

    CURRENT
    This repository contains code to deduplicate language model datasets as descrbed in the paper "Deduplicating Training Data Makes Language Models Better" by Katherine Lee, Daphne Ippolito, Andrew Nystrom, Chiyuan Zhang, Douglas Eck, Chris Callison-Burch and Nicholas Carlini. We release the ExactSubstr deduplication implementation (written in Rust) along with the scripts we used in the paper to perform ExactSubstr deduplication and inspect the results (written in Python).
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    This repository provides the **ExactSubstr deduplication implementation (written in Rust)** and associated Python scripts, as described in the paper "Deduplicating Training Data Makes Language Models Better". It enables efficient deduplication of large language model datasets to improve training and reduce memorization. We also release document clusters from NearDup deduplication on C4, RealNews, LM1B, and Wiki-4B-en.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
1 / 2
50% of queries surface google-research/deduplicate-text-datasets
Avg rank
#2.0
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
6%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Apache Spark
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Apache Spark · recommended 2×
  2. datasketch · recommended 1×
  3. text_dedup · recommended 1×
  4. dedupe · recommended 1×
  5. Spark's MLlib · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking a method to efficiently deduplicate massive text corpora for training large language models.
    you: #2
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. datasketch
    2. deduplicate-text-datasets ← you
    3. text_dedup
    4. Apache Spark
    5. dedupe
    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are robust tools for identifying and removing duplicate content from very large text datasets?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Apache Spark
    2. Spark's MLlib
    3. MinHashLSH
    4. Dedupe.io (dedupeio/dedupe)
    5. Datasketch (ekzhu/datasketch)
    6. Dask (dask/dask)
    7. PySpark
    8. Elasticsearch (elastic/elasticsearch)
    9. Python
    10. fuzzywuzzy (seatgeek/fuzzywuzzy)
    11. difflib
    12. OpenRefine (OpenRefine/OpenRefine)

    AI recommended 12 alternatives but never named google-research/deduplicate-text-datasets. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of google-research/deduplicate-text-datasets?
    pass
    AI did not name google-research/deduplicate-text-datasets — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts google-research/deduplicate-text-datasets in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named google-research/deduplicate-text-datasets explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo google-research/deduplicate-text-datasets solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name google-research/deduplicate-text-datasets — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of google-research/deduplicate-text-datasets. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/google-research/deduplicate-text-datasets.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/google-research/deduplicate-text-datasets)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/google-research/deduplicate-text-datasets"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/google-research/deduplicate-text-datasets.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

google-research/deduplicate-text-datasets — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite