RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

boku7/Loki

Default branch main · commit 122924b5 · scanned 5/26/2026, 4:17:15 AM

GitHub: 1,324 stars · 215 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface boku7/Loki, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add specific topics for C2, red teaming, and Electron exploitation

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    red-team, c2-framework, electron-exploitation, script-jacking, mitre-attack, nodejs, cybersecurity, offensive-security
  • highhomepage#2
    Add a homepage link to the blog post

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://trustedsec.com/blog/bypassing-windows-defender-application-control-with-loki-c2
  • mediumreadme#3
    Add a clear license statement to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## License
This project includes a LICENSE file. Please refer to it for specific terms, as it may contain custom or compound licensing information.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface boku7/Loki
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Squirrel.Windows
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Squirrel.Windows · recommended 1×
  2. Electron Updater · recommended 1×
  3. DLL Hijack Auditor · recommended 1×
  4. Process Monitor · recommended 1×
  5. Node.js · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to backdoor signed Electron applications for red team operations without breaking code integrity?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Squirrel.Windows
    2. Electron Updater
    3. DLL Hijack Auditor
    4. Process Monitor
    5. Node.js
    6. Chromium
    7. remote Module
    8. webview Tag

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named boku7/Loki. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools can help with script-jacking vulnerabilities in Node.js Electron applications for C2?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Electronegativity
    2. Snyk
    3. OWASP Dependency-Check
    4. ESLint
    5. eslint-plugin-security
    6. CSP Evaluator
    7. njsscan
    8. Burp Suite
    9. OWASP ZAP

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named boku7/Loki. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of boku7/Loki?
    pass
    AI named boku7/Loki explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts boku7/Loki in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named boku7/Loki explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo boku7/Loki solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named boku7/Loki explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of boku7/Loki. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/boku7/Loki.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/boku7/Loki)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/boku7/Loki"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/boku7/Loki.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

boku7/Loki — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite
boku7/Loki — RepoGEO report