RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

max0x7ba/atomic_queue

Default branch master · commit e9724223 · scanned 7/1/2026, 7:27:48 PM

GitHub: 1,861 stars · 216 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface max0x7ba/atomic_queue, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Strengthen README's opening with unique algorithmic differentiators

    Why:

    CURRENT
    C++14 multiple-producer-multiple-consumer *lock-free* queues based on circular buffers and `std::atomic`.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    C++14 multiple-producer-multiple-consumer *lock-free* queues, implementing the LCRQ (Lock-Free Concurrent Ring Buffer Queue) algorithm. It offers wait-free guarantees for its SPSC (Single-Producer Single-Consumer) variant, built on circular buffers and `std::atomic`.
  • mediumreadme#2
    Add a dedicated comparison section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    A new section titled 'Why atomic_queue?' or 'Comparison with Alternatives' detailing its LCRQ implementation, wait-free SPSC guarantees, and specific latency/throughput characteristics compared to other popular C++ lock-free queues.
  • lowhomepage#3
    Update homepage URL to a general project overview or documentation

    Why:

    CURRENT
    https://max0x7ba.github.io/atomic_queue/html/benchmarks.html
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://max0x7ba.github.io/atomic_queue/ (or a similar general project/documentation page if one exists, otherwise consider creating one)

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface max0x7ba/atomic_queue
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
moodycamel::ConcurrentQueue
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. moodycamel::ConcurrentQueue · recommended 1×
  2. folly::MPMCQueue · recommended 1×
  3. boost::lockfree::queue · recommended 1×
  4. std::atomic_queue · recommended 1×
  5. SPSCQueue · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Need a C++ lock-free queue for high-performance, low-latency multi-threaded applications.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. moodycamel::ConcurrentQueue
    2. folly::MPMCQueue
    3. boost::lockfree::queue
    4. std::atomic_queue
    5. SPSCQueue
    6. concurrent_queue

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named max0x7ba/atomic_queue. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a C++ circular buffer implementation with atomic operations for concurrency.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Boost

    AI recommended 1 alternative but never named max0x7ba/atomic_queue. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of max0x7ba/atomic_queue?
    pass
    AI named max0x7ba/atomic_queue explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts max0x7ba/atomic_queue in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named max0x7ba/atomic_queue explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo max0x7ba/atomic_queue solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named max0x7ba/atomic_queue explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of max0x7ba/atomic_queue. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/max0x7ba/atomic_queue.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/max0x7ba/atomic_queue)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/max0x7ba/atomic_queue"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/max0x7ba/atomic_queue.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

max0x7ba/atomic_queue — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite