RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

mishushakov/llm-scraper

Default branch main · commit 21bf37a6 · scanned 5/19/2026, 2:33:25 AM

GitHub: 6,552 stars · 413 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface mishushakov/llm-scraper, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README H1 and opening paragraph to highlight unique value

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # LLM Scraper
    
    LLM Scraper is a TypeScript library that allows you to extract structured data from **any** webpage using LLMs.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # LLM Scraper: AI-Powered Web Scraping without Selectors
    
    LLM Scraper is a TypeScript library that leverages Large Language Models to extract structured data from **any** webpage, eliminating the need for manual CSS selectors or XPath.
  • highhomepage#2
    Add a homepage URL to the repository's About section

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Set the repository's homepage URL in the 'About' section to the project's official website or documentation.
  • mediumtopics#3
    Expand repository topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    CURRENT
    ai, artificial-intelligence, browser, browser-automation, gpt, gpt-4, langchain, llama, llm, openai, playwright, puppeteer, scraper
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai, artificial-intelligence, browser, browser-automation, gpt, gpt-4, langchain, llama, llm, openai, playwright, puppeteer, scraper, structured-data, schema-validation, web-scraping, typescript-library

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface mishushakov/llm-scraper
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
OpenAI GPT-4
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. OpenAI GPT-4 · recommended 1×
  2. GPT-3.5 Turbo · recommended 1×
  3. Function Calling · recommended 1×
  4. Anthropic Claude · recommended 1×
  5. Claude 3 Opus · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to extract structured data from any webpage using large language models?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. OpenAI GPT-4
    2. GPT-3.5 Turbo
    3. Function Calling
    4. Anthropic Claude
    5. Claude 3 Opus
    6. Claude 3 Sonnet
    7. LlamaIndex
    8. LangChain
    9. Llama 3
    10. Mixtral 8x7B
    11. PromptLayer
    12. Vellum
    13. Humanloop
    14. ScrapeGraphAI
    15. Playwright
    16. Selenium

    AI recommended 16 alternatives but never named mishushakov/llm-scraper. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking a TypeScript library for AI-powered web content extraction with schema validation.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. OpenAI API
    2. zod (colinhacks/zod)
    3. TypeBox (sinclairzx81/typebox)
    4. LangChain.js (langchain-ai/langchainjs)
    5. LlamaIndex.TS (run-llama/LlamaIndexTS)
    6. html-to-json
    7. cheerio (cheeriojs/cheerio)

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named mishushakov/llm-scraper. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of mishushakov/llm-scraper?
    pass
    AI named mishushakov/llm-scraper explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts mishushakov/llm-scraper in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named mishushakov/llm-scraper explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo mishushakov/llm-scraper solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named mishushakov/llm-scraper explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of mishushakov/llm-scraper. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/mishushakov/llm-scraper.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/mishushakov/llm-scraper)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/mishushakov/llm-scraper"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/mishushakov/llm-scraper.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

mishushakov/llm-scraper — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite