REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

rohitg00/pro-workflow

Default branch main · commit 9fc35f5e · scanned 5/23/2026, 1:07:08 AM

GitHub: 2,206 stars · 207 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE

35 /100

Critical

Category recall

0 / 2

Not recommended in any query

Rule findings

1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail

Objective metadata checks

AI knows your name

3 / 3

Direct prompts that named your repo

HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface rohitg00/pro-workflow, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION

highreadme#1

Reposition README's core value proposition for AI coding assistants

Why:

CURRENT

The current README starts with a centered H3 'Your Claude Code gets smarter every session.' but the core problem/solution is further down, allowing misinterpretation.

COPY-PASTE FIX

Add a clear, concise statement at the very top of the README, before any other content, explicitly stating: 'Pro Workflow is a self-correcting memory and knowledge plane for Claude Code, enabling your AI coding assistant to learn from corrections and build persistent knowledge over 50+ sessions.'

highlicense#2

Add a standard open-source LICENSE file

Why:

COPY-PASTE FIX

Create a `LICENSE` file in the repository root with the text of a standard open-source license (e.g., MIT License).

mediumreadme#3

Clarify differentiation from generic LLM frameworks in README

Why:

CURRENT

The 'Solution' section describes self-correction memory and knowledge plane but doesn't explicitly contrast with other tools.

COPY-PASTE FIX

In the 'Solution' section or a new 'Why Pro Workflow?' section, add a sentence like: 'Unlike generic LLM frameworks or vector databases, Pro Workflow is purpose-built for AI coding assistants like Claude Code, providing compounding, self-correcting memory directly integrated into your development workflow, ensuring mistakes are never repeated and knowledge persists across sessions.'

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall

0 / 2

0% of queries surface rohitg00/pro-workflow

Avg rank

—

Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.

Share of voice

Of all named tools, what % are you?

Top rival

LangChain

Recommended in 2 of 2 queries

COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD

LangChain · recommended 2×
Pinecone · recommended 2×
Chroma · recommended 2×
Weaviate · recommended 2×
Milvus · recommended 1×

CATEGORY QUERY
How to make my AI coding assistant remember past corrections and improve over time?
you: not recommended
AI recommended (in order):
1. LangChain
2. Pinecone
3. Chroma
4. Weaviate
5. Milvus
6. OpenAI API
7. Anthropic
8. Cohere
9. gpt-3.5-turbo
10. TRL
11. Hugging Face
12. PostgreSQL
13. MongoDB
14. SQLite
AI recommended 14 alternatives but never named rohitg00/pro-workflow. This is the gap to close.
Show full AI answer
CATEGORY QUERY
What tools prevent AI coding agents from repeating past mistakes and losing context?
you: not recommended
AI recommended (in order):
1. LangChain
2. LlamaIndex
3. MemGPT
4. Auto-GPT
5. BabyAGI
6. Weights & Biases (W&B)
7. MLflow
8. Pinecone
9. Weaviate
10. Chroma
11. Git
12. GitHub
13. GitLab
AI recommended 13 alternatives but never named rohitg00/pro-workflow. This is the gap to close.
Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

Metadata completeness
warn
Suggestion:
README presence
pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of rohitg00/pro-workflow?
pass
AI named rohitg00/pro-workflow explicitly
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
If a team adopts rohitg00/pro-workflow in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
pass
AI named rohitg00/pro-workflow explicitly
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
In one sentence, what problem does the repo rohitg00/pro-workflow solve, and who is the primary audience?
pass
AI named rohitg00/pro-workflow explicitly
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of rohitg00/pro-workflow. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

Live preview

MARKDOWN (README)

[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/rohitg00/pro-workflow.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/rohitg00/pro-workflow)

HTML

<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/rohitg00/pro-workflow"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/rohitg00/pro-workflow.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>

Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

rohitg00/pro-workflow — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

Deep reports10 / month
Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite