RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

PolySync/oscc

Default branch master · commit 45ce9fcc · scanned 6/20/2026, 5:47:08 PM

GitHub: 1,034 stars · 284 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface PolySync/oscc, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add relevant topics to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    autonomous-vehicles, drive-by-wire, vehicle-control, can-bus, robotics, automotive, open-source-hardware, embedded-systems, firmware, api
  • mediumreadme#2
    Clarify the repository's license in the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a section or line in the README, e.g., 'This project is licensed under [Specify License Name(s) and terms, e.g., a custom license combining X and Y]. See the LICENSE file for full details.'
  • lowhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    [Insert URL to project website, documentation, or main organization page, e.g., https://polysync.io/oscc or https://polysync.io]

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface PolySync/oscc
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
OpenPilot
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. OpenPilot · recommended 2×
  2. ROS · recommended 1×
  3. Autoware.Auto · recommended 1×
  4. Autoware.Universe · recommended 1×
  5. Apollo · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What open source tools enable software control of vehicle steering, throttle, and braking for AV development?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. ROS
    2. Autoware.Auto
    3. Autoware.Universe
    4. OpenPilot
    5. Apollo
    6. CARLA Simulator
    7. PX4 Autopilot

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named PolySync/oscc. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Are there open source frameworks for safe, low-level vehicle control without altering factory safety features?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. OpenPilot
    2. Autoware
    3. ROS (Robot Operating System)
    4. ros_canopen
    5. dbw_mkz (ros-drivers/dbw_mkz)
    6. Panda
    7. Carla Simulator

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named PolySync/oscc. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of PolySync/oscc?
    pass
    AI named PolySync/oscc explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts PolySync/oscc in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named PolySync/oscc explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo PolySync/oscc solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named PolySync/oscc explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of PolySync/oscc. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/PolySync/oscc.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/PolySync/oscc)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/PolySync/oscc"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/PolySync/oscc.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

PolySync/oscc — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite