RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

hendrycks/apps

Default branch main · commit 362aedc3 · scanned 6/5/2026, 3:38:02 AM

GitHub: 531 stars · 70 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface hendrycks/apps, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README H1 to specify category

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # Measuring Coding Challenge Competence With APPS
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # APPS: An AI Benchmark Dataset for Evaluating Code Generation on Competitive Programming Challenges
  • mediumtopics#2
    Expand topics to include AI benchmark and evaluation terms

    Why:

    CURRENT
    code-generation, program-synthesis
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    code-generation, program-synthesis, ai-benchmark, dataset, llm-evaluation, competitive-programming
  • lowhomepage#3
    Add the NeurIPS paper URL as the repository's homepage

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://neurips.cc/virtual/2021/poster/22008

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface hendrycks/apps
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Codeforces
Recommended in 3 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Codeforces · recommended 3×
  2. AtCoder · recommended 2×
  3. TopCoder · recommended 2×
  4. LeetCode · recommended 2×
  5. HackerRank · recommended 2×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to objectively measure AI model performance on competitive programming challenges?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Codeforces
    2. AtCoder
    3. TopCoder
    4. Google Code Jam
    5. Facebook Hacker Cup
    6. LeetCode
    7. HackerRank
    8. OpenAI's HumanEval
    9. Google's CodeContests
    10. Hypothesis
    11. QuickCheck
    12. Docker
    13. isolate

    AI recommended 13 alternatives but never named hendrycks/apps. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Where can I find large datasets for training AI models to generate programming solutions?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Hugging Face Datasets
    2. CodeSearchNet
    3. CodeXGlue
    4. The Stack
    5. BigQuery Public Datasets
    6. Kaggle
    7. Codeforces
    8. TopCoder
    9. HackerRank
    10. GitHub
    11. GitHub API
    12. Awesome-Public-Datasets (awesomedata/awesome-public-datasets)
    13. Project Euler
    14. Stack Overflow/Stack Exchange Data Dump
    15. Codeforces
    16. AtCoder
    17. LeetCode

    AI recommended 17 alternatives but never named hendrycks/apps. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of hendrycks/apps?
    pass
    AI named hendrycks/apps explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts hendrycks/apps in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named hendrycks/apps explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo hendrycks/apps solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named hendrycks/apps explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of hendrycks/apps. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/hendrycks/apps.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/hendrycks/apps)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/hendrycks/apps"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/hendrycks/apps.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

hendrycks/apps — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite
hendrycks/apps — RepoGEO report