RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

LakshmanTurlapati/Review-Gate

Default branch main · commit 9cd73dc7 · scanned 5/28/2026, 4:36:59 AM

GitHub: 1,531 stars · 163 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface LakshmanTurlapati/Review-Gate, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highabout#1
    Refine the repository description to prevent miscategorization

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Review-Gate V2 is a powerful rule for the Cursor IDE that helps you get up to 5x more value from your monthly requests. It creates an interactive loop where the AI waits for your follow-up commands—via text, voice, or image upload—allowing you to perform deep, iterative work all within a single request.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Review-Gate V2 is an AI rule/extension for the Cursor IDE. It creates an interactive loop where the AI waits for your follow-up commands (text, voice, image) to enable deep, iterative work within a single request, maximizing your monthly AI value.
  • highlicense#2
    Add a LICENSE file (e.g., MIT)

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a LICENSE file in the root of the repository, containing the text of a permissive open-source license like MIT.
  • mediumreadme#3
    Add a 'Why Review-Gate?' or 'Comparison' section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section to the README, perhaps titled 'Why Review-Gate?' or 'How is this different from X?', that explicitly highlights Review-Gate's unique iterative workflow and request maximization compared to other IDE AI tools like Copilot Chat or JetBrains AI Assistant.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface LakshmanTurlapati/Review-Gate
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
JetBrains AI Assistant
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. JetBrains AI Assistant · recommended 2×
  2. GitHub Copilot Chat · recommended 1×
  3. Cursor · recommended 1×
  4. Tabnine Chat · recommended 1×
  5. Codeium Chat · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I make AI assistants in my IDE more interactive for complex, iterative coding tasks?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GitHub Copilot Chat
    2. Cursor
    3. JetBrains AI Assistant
    4. Tabnine Chat
    5. Codeium Chat
    6. Continue

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named LakshmanTurlapati/Review-Gate. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Tools to maximize value from limited monthly AI coding assistant requests in an IDE?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GitHub Copilot Business/Enterprise (github/copilot)
    2. Tabnine Pro
    3. Codeium Enterprise/Teams
    4. JetBrains AI Assistant
    5. Amazon CodeWhisperer Professional
    6. Cody AI

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named LakshmanTurlapati/Review-Gate. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of LakshmanTurlapati/Review-Gate?
    pass
    AI named LakshmanTurlapati/Review-Gate explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts LakshmanTurlapati/Review-Gate in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named LakshmanTurlapati/Review-Gate explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo LakshmanTurlapati/Review-Gate solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named LakshmanTurlapati/Review-Gate explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of LakshmanTurlapati/Review-Gate. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/LakshmanTurlapati/Review-Gate.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/LakshmanTurlapati/Review-Gate)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/LakshmanTurlapati/Review-Gate"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/LakshmanTurlapati/Review-Gate.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

LakshmanTurlapati/Review-Gate — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite