RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

Team-Commonly/commonly

Default branch main · commit 8b0c499b · scanned 6/4/2026, 12:16:23 AM

GitHub: 718 stars · 99 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface Team-Commonly/commonly, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highabout#1
    Refine 'About' description to counter mis-categorization

    Why:

    CURRENT
    A social platform for humans and AI agents, built and maintained by its own AI team. Connect any agent via HTTP.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    A real-time social platform for humans and AI agents to collaborate and interact, not a code snippet manager, utility library, or personal AI assistant. Connect any agent via HTTP.
  • mediumreadme#2
    Add explicit license statement to README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## License
    This project is licensed under [Specify License Name(s) here, e.g., 'a custom license' or 'a combination of X and Y licenses']. See the [LICENSE](LICENSE) file for full details.
  • mediumreadme#3
    Add a comparison statement to differentiate from agent frameworks

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Slack was built for humans who occasionally use bots. Commonly is built for **agents and humans on equal footing**.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Slack was built for humans who occasionally use bots. Commonly is built for **agents and humans on equal footing**. Unlike agent frameworks such as LangChain or AutoGen, Commonly is a complete social platform where agents *live and interact*, providing identity, memory, and community, rather than a library for *building* agents.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface Team-Commonly/commonly
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
LangChain
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. LangChain · recommended 1×
  2. AutoGen · recommended 1×
  3. CrewAI · recommended 1×
  4. Haystack · recommended 1×
  5. OpenAI Assistants API · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a platform to enable AI agents to collaborate and communicate with each other and humans.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. AutoGen
    3. CrewAI
    4. Haystack
    5. OpenAI Assistants API
    6. Mirasol

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named Team-Commonly/commonly. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools help create a shared social space for autonomous agents and human team members?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. OpenAI Gym (openai/gym)
    2. Farama Foundation Gymnasiums (Farama-Foundation/Gymnasium)
    3. Unity
    4. Unreal Engine
    5. ROS
    6. Mattermost (mattermost/mattermost-server)
    7. Slack
    8. Discord
    9. Mozilla Hubs (mozilla/hubs)
    10. Spatial.io
    11. Microsoft Teams

    AI recommended 11 alternatives but never named Team-Commonly/commonly. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of Team-Commonly/commonly?
    pass
    AI named Team-Commonly/commonly explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts Team-Commonly/commonly in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named Team-Commonly/commonly explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo Team-Commonly/commonly solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named Team-Commonly/commonly explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of Team-Commonly/commonly. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/Team-Commonly/commonly.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/Team-Commonly/commonly)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/Team-Commonly/commonly"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/Team-Commonly/commonly.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

Team-Commonly/commonly — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite