RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

brexhq/prompt-engineering

Default branch main · commit 50871be1 · scanned 5/24/2026, 6:13:15 AM

GitHub: 9,539 stars · 515 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface brexhq/prompt-engineering, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add specific topics to clarify the repository's category

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    prompt-engineering, llm-guide, large-language-models, ai-best-practices, generative-ai, prompt-design, llm-safety, ai-safety
  • mediumreadme#2
    Strengthen the README's opening paragraph to highlight the problem and audience

    Why:

    CURRENT
    This guide was created by Brex for internal purposes. It's based on lessons learned from researching and creating Large Language Model (LLM) prompts for production use cases. It covers the history around LLMs as well as strategies, guidelines, and safety recommendations for working with and building programmatic systems on top of large language models, like OpenAI's GPT-4.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    This guide from Brex provides battle-tested strategies, guidelines, and safety recommendations for developers and AI practitioners building production-ready systems with Large Language Models (LLMs) like OpenAI's GPT-4. Learn from our internal lessons on crafting effective and safe LLM prompts for real-world use cases.
  • lowcomparison#3
    Add a 'How is this different?' section to clarify its role against tools

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## How is this guide different from LLM libraries or APIs?
    
    This repository is a comprehensive guide and collection of best practices for prompt engineering, not a software library, API, or a specific LLM tool. While it provides strategies for working with models like OpenAI's GPT-4, it does not offer code for interacting with these models directly. Instead, it complements tools like LangChain or LlamaIndex by providing the foundational knowledge needed to use them effectively and safely.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface brexhq/prompt-engineering
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
OpenAI Playground
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. OpenAI Playground · recommended 1×
  2. Anthropic Claude · recommended 1×
  3. langchain-ai/langchain · recommended 1×
  4. run-llama/llama_index · recommended 1×
  5. Google Gemini API · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are the best strategies for designing effective prompts for large language models?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. OpenAI Playground
    2. Anthropic Claude
    3. LangChain (langchain-ai/langchain)
    4. LlamaIndex (run-llama/llama_index)
    5. Google Gemini API
    6. Pydantic (pydantic/pydantic)
    7. GPT-4
    8. Claude 3
    9. Mistral Large
    10. ChatGPT
    11. Perplexity AI
    12. Weights & Biases (wandb/wandb)
    13. Vellum

    AI recommended 13 alternatives but never named brexhq/prompt-engineering. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for best practices to ensure safety and quality in LLM prompt development.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. LlamaIndex
    3. NeMo Guardrails
    4. Microsoft Azure AI Content Safety
    5. Git
    6. DVC
    7. Arize AI
    8. Weights & Biases Prompts
    9. Label Studio
    10. Argilla
    11. Langfuse
    12. Helicone

    AI recommended 12 alternatives but never named brexhq/prompt-engineering. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of brexhq/prompt-engineering?
    pass
    AI named brexhq/prompt-engineering explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts brexhq/prompt-engineering in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named brexhq/prompt-engineering explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo brexhq/prompt-engineering solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name brexhq/prompt-engineering — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of brexhq/prompt-engineering. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/brexhq/prompt-engineering.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/brexhq/prompt-engineering)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/brexhq/prompt-engineering"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/brexhq/prompt-engineering.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

brexhq/prompt-engineering — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite