RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

0-AI-UG/cate

Default branch main · commit 81a69aa6 · scanned 6/5/2026, 2:22:22 AM

GitHub: 1,165 stars · 69 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface 0-AI-UG/cate, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add relevant topics to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ide, infinite-canvas, spatial-computing, code-editor, developer-tools, terminal, browser, workspace
  • highreadme#2
    Reposition README's opening to emphasize "spatial coding environment"

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Cate is a desktop IDE built on an infinite canvas.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Cate is a desktop IDE and spatial coding environment built on an infinite canvas.
  • mediumreadme#3
    Clarify the role of "AI agents" in the README

    Why:

    CURRENT
    An infinite canvas for your code, terminals, browsers, docs, and AI agents.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    An infinite canvas for your code, terminals, browsers, and documents. It also supports integrating and managing AI agents within your spatial workspace.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface 0-AI-UG/cate
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
VS Code
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. VS Code · recommended 2×
  2. Cursor · recommended 1×
  3. CodeTour · recommended 1×
  4. Bookmarks · recommended 1×
  5. Live Share · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a coding environment with an infinite canvas for organizing code and terminals.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Cursor
    2. VS Code
    3. CodeTour
    4. Bookmarks
    5. Live Share
    6. JupyterLab
    7. Obsidian
    8. Zed
    9. Neovim
    10. Vim
    11. tmux
    12. zellij

    AI recommended 12 alternatives but never named 0-AI-UG/cate. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to manage multiple coding panels spatially instead of traditional stacked windows and tabs?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. VS Code
    2. Tmux
    3. i3wm
    4. AwesomeWM
    5. Sway
    6. NeoVim/Vim
    7. Sublime Text
    8. Emacs

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named 0-AI-UG/cate. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of 0-AI-UG/cate?
    pass
    AI named 0-AI-UG/cate explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts 0-AI-UG/cate in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named 0-AI-UG/cate explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo 0-AI-UG/cate solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named 0-AI-UG/cate explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of 0-AI-UG/cate. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/0-AI-UG/cate.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/0-AI-UG/cate)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/0-AI-UG/cate"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/0-AI-UG/cate.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

0-AI-UG/cate — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite
0-AI-UG/cate — RepoGEO report