RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

lupantech/AgentFlow

Default branch main · commit b9400643 · scanned 6/27/2026, 1:47:23 AM

GitHub: 1,936 stars · 227 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

3 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface lupantech/AgentFlow, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Add a concise problem/solution statement to the README's opening

    Why:

    CURRENT
    The README currently jumps from the title to news updates without a clear introductory paragraph.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    AgentFlow is a lightweight, explicit, and flexible flow-based framework designed to optimize the performance and reasoning capabilities of multi-agent LLM systems. It provides integrated state management and a direct graph-based approach for orchestrating complex agent interactions, making it ideal for developers building advanced agentic applications.
  • mediumtopics#2
    Add more specific topics related to agent optimization and orchestration frameworks

    Why:

    CURRENT
    agentic-ai, agentic-systems, llms, llms-reasoning, multi-agent-systems, reinforcement-learning, tool-augmented
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    agentic-ai, agentic-systems, llms, llms-reasoning, multi-agent-systems, reinforcement-learning, tool-augmented, agent-orchestration, llm-agent-framework, agent-optimization, workflow-automation
  • lowreadme#3
    Add a 'Comparison' or 'Why AgentFlow?' section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## Why AgentFlow?
    AgentFlow differentiates itself from broader LLM frameworks like LangChain and LlamaIndex by offering a lightweight, explicit, and flexible flow-based architecture specifically designed for in-the-flow agentic system optimization. Our focus is on providing integrated state management and a direct graph-based approach for orchestrating complex agent interactions, enabling fine-grained control and performance tuning for advanced multi-agent applications.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface lupantech/AgentFlow
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
LangChain
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. LangChain · recommended 2×
  2. LlamaIndex · recommended 2×
  3. OpenAI API · recommended 1×
  4. Ray · recommended 1×
  5. Redis · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I optimize the performance of my multi-agent LLM systems?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. LlamaIndex
    3. OpenAI API
    4. Ray
    5. Redis
    6. FastAPI
    7. LiteLLM

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named lupantech/AgentFlow. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for frameworks to enhance LLM agent reasoning and tool augmentation capabilities.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. LlamaIndex
    3. AutoGPT
    4. Microsoft Guidance
    5. Haystack
    6. CrewAI

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named lupantech/AgentFlow. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of lupantech/AgentFlow?
    pass
    AI named lupantech/AgentFlow explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts lupantech/AgentFlow in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named lupantech/AgentFlow explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo lupantech/AgentFlow solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named lupantech/AgentFlow explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of lupantech/AgentFlow. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/lupantech/AgentFlow.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/lupantech/AgentFlow)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/lupantech/AgentFlow"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/lupantech/AgentFlow.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

lupantech/AgentFlow — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite