RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

openai/plugins

Default branch main · commit dc902811 · scanned 5/17/2026, 9:02:30 PM

GitHub: 1,152 stars · 158 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
30 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface openai/plugins, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add specific topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ["chatgpt-plugins", "openai-plugins", "llm-extensions", "api-integration", "developer-tools", "examples"]
  • highreadme#2
    Reposition the README H1 to specify its role as the official ChatGPT plugin framework

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # Plugins

This repository contains a curated collection of Codex plugin examples.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # ChatGPT Plugins

This repository provides the official framework and a curated collection of examples for building plugins that extend ChatGPT's capabilities to interact with external services.
  • highlicense#3
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a `LICENSE` file in the repository root containing the chosen open-source license text. Additionally, add a line to the README, e.g., 'This project is licensed under the [License Name] License - see the [LICENSE](LICENSE) file for details.'

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface openai/plugins
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
LangChain
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. LangChain · recommended 2×
  2. OpenAI API · recommended 2×
  3. Hugging Face Transformers · recommended 2×
  4. LlamaIndex · recommended 1×
  5. Anthropic Claude · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to integrate large language models with my existing development workflows?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. LlamaIndex
    3. OpenAI API
    4. Anthropic Claude
    5. Google Gemini
    6. Hugging Face Transformers
    7. MLflow
    8. Weights & Biases
    9. Guardrails AI

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named openai/plugins. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for examples to build custom AI extensions for various applications.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. OpenAI API
    2. Hugging Face Transformers
    3. Google Cloud AI Platform / Vertex AI
    4. Microsoft Azure AI Services
    5. TensorFlow.js / PyTorch Mobile
    6. LangChain
    7. Lobe.ai

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named openai/plugins. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of openai/plugins?
    pass
    AI named openai/plugins explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts openai/plugins in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named openai/plugins explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo openai/plugins solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named openai/plugins explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of openai/plugins. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/openai/plugins.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/openai/plugins)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/openai/plugins"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/openai/plugins.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

openai/plugins — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite