RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

tibbar213/team-manage

Default branch main · commit d655d6be · scanned 6/20/2026, 10:57:57 AM

GitHub: 1,057 stars · 282 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface tibbar213/team-manage, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

1 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • mediumreadme#1
    Reinforce 'ChatGPT Team' focus in README's opening

    Why:

    CURRENT
    一个基于 FastAPI 的 ChatGPT Team 账号管理系统，支持管理员批量管理 Team 账号，用户通过兑换码自动加入 Team。
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    一个专为 **ChatGPT Team 账号** 设计的管理系统，基于 FastAPI 构建，支持管理员批量管理 Team 账号，并允许用户通过兑换码自动加入 Team。它专注于解决管理多个 ChatGPT Team 订阅和用户邀请的痛点。

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface tibbar213/team-manage
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Auth0
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Auth0 · recommended 2×
  2. Okta · recommended 1×
  3. Microsoft Entra ID · recommended 1×
  4. JumpCloud · recommended 1×
  5. Google Workspace · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to manage multiple AI subscription team accounts and automate user invitations?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Okta
    2. Microsoft Entra ID
    3. JumpCloud
    4. Google Workspace
    5. Auth0
    6. OneLogin

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named tibbar213/team-manage. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a self-hosted system to manage AI team memberships with redemption codes.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Keycloak
    2. Auth0
    3. FusionAuth
    4. OpenIddict
    5. Strapi

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named tibbar213/team-manage. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of tibbar213/team-manage?
    pass
    AI did not name tibbar213/team-manage — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts tibbar213/team-manage in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named tibbar213/team-manage explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo tibbar213/team-manage solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named tibbar213/team-manage explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of tibbar213/team-manage. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/tibbar213/team-manage.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/tibbar213/team-manage)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/tibbar213/team-manage"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/tibbar213/team-manage.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

tibbar213/team-manage — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite
tibbar213/team-manage — RepoGEO report