RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

therealXiaomanChu/ex-skill

Default branch main · commit a7c06380 · scanned 6/18/2026, 2:37:53 AM

GitHub: 5,592 stars · 518 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface therealXiaomanChu/ex-skill, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README opening to clearly state project's purpose

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    在 README 的项目标题下方，添加一行明确的项目定位：`这是一个将个人数据（如聊天记录）蒸馏成个性化 AI Skill 的工具，旨在让 AI 以特定人物（如前任）的方式与你对话，用于情感回忆与疗愈。`
  • hightopics#2
    Add relevant GitHub topics

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (none)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai-chatbot, personalization, emotional-support, llm-application, claude-skill, memory-recollection, personal-ai
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/therealXiaomanChu/ex-skill

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface therealXiaomanChu/ex-skill
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Google Cloud Vertex AI
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Google Cloud Vertex AI · recommended 2×
  2. OpenAI GPT-3.5/GPT-4 · recommended 1×
  3. huggingface/transformers · recommended 1×
  4. Llama 2 · recommended 1×
  5. Mistral 7B · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I build a personalized AI chatbot that talks exactly like a specific person?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. OpenAI GPT-3.5/GPT-4
    2. Hugging Face Transformers (huggingface/transformers)
    3. Llama 2
    4. Mistral 7B
    5. Google Cloud Vertex AI
    6. ElevenLabs
    7. LangChain (langchain-ai/langchain)
    8. LlamaIndex (run-llama/llama_index)

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named therealXiaomanChu/ex-skill. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Tools for creating a custom AI agent from personal chat logs for emotional support?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. OpenAI API
    2. Hugging Face Transformers
    3. LangChain
    4. Google Cloud Vertex AI
    5. Cohere
    6. Rasa
    7. DeepPavlov

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named therealXiaomanChu/ex-skill. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of therealXiaomanChu/ex-skill?
    pass
    AI named therealXiaomanChu/ex-skill explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts therealXiaomanChu/ex-skill in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named therealXiaomanChu/ex-skill explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo therealXiaomanChu/ex-skill solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named therealXiaomanChu/ex-skill explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of therealXiaomanChu/ex-skill. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/therealXiaomanChu/ex-skill.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/therealXiaomanChu/ex-skill)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/therealXiaomanChu/ex-skill"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/therealXiaomanChu/ex-skill.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

therealXiaomanChu/ex-skill — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite