RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

spcl/graph-of-thoughts

Default branch main · commit 3d9d9dbd · scanned 6/20/2026, 2:51:44 PM

GitHub: 2,722 stars · 209 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface spcl/graph-of-thoughts, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README opening to explicitly state it's an LLM reasoning framework

    Why:

    CURRENT
    This is the official implementation of Graph of Thoughts: Solving Elaborate Problems with Large Language Models. This framework gives you the ability to solve complex problems by modeling them as a Graph of Operations (GoO), which is automatically executed with a Large Language Model (LLM) as the engine.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Graph of Thoughts (GoT) is an official open-source framework for solving elaborate problems with Large Language Models (LLMs) by modeling them as a Graph of Operations (GoO). This framework gives you the ability to solve complex problems by automatically executing GoOs with an LLM as the engine.
  • mediumtopics#2
    Add `llm-framework` and `ai-framework` topics

    Why:

    CURRENT
    graph-of-thoughts, graph-structures, graphs, large-language-models, llm, prompt-engineering, prompting
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    graph-of-thoughts, graph-structures, graphs, large-language-models, llm, prompt-engineering, prompting, llm-framework, ai-framework
  • lowlicense#3
    Add a section to README clarifying the project's license

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## License
    
    This project is licensed under [State the specific license(s) here, e.g., 'the Apache 2.0 License and the MIT License for specific components']. Please refer to the `LICENSE` file for full details.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface spcl/graph-of-thoughts
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
LangChain
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. LangChain · recommended 2×
  2. LlamaIndex · recommended 2×
  3. OpenAI's GPT-4 · recommended 1×
  4. Anthropic's Claude 3 Opus · recommended 1×
  5. Google's Gemini Advanced · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to improve large language model reasoning for elaborate problems using structured prompts?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. OpenAI's GPT-4
    2. Anthropic's Claude 3 Opus
    3. Google's Gemini Advanced
    4. OpenAI's GPT-4 Turbo
    5. Anthropic's Claude 3 Sonnet/Opus
    6. Pinecone
    7. Weaviate
    8. Chroma
    9. LangChain
    10. LlamaIndex
    11. Mistral AI's Mixtral 8x7B
    12. Google's PaLM 2
    13. Meta's Llama 2

    AI recommended 13 alternatives but never named spcl/graph-of-thoughts. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Framework for building complex LLM problem-solving workflows beyond basic chain-of-thought?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. LlamaIndex
    3. AutoGen
    4. Haystack
    5. DSPy
    6. CrewAI

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named spcl/graph-of-thoughts. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of spcl/graph-of-thoughts?
    pass
    AI named spcl/graph-of-thoughts explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts spcl/graph-of-thoughts in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named spcl/graph-of-thoughts explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo spcl/graph-of-thoughts solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named spcl/graph-of-thoughts explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of spcl/graph-of-thoughts. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/spcl/graph-of-thoughts.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/spcl/graph-of-thoughts)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/spcl/graph-of-thoughts"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/spcl/graph-of-thoughts.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

spcl/graph-of-thoughts — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite