RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

RichardAtCT/claude-code-telegram

Default branch main · commit fa008b37 · scanned 5/20/2026, 1:36:30 PM

GitHub: 2,610 stars · 385 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
23 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface RichardAtCT/claude-code-telegram, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README H1 to specify 'AI Coding Assistant'

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # Claude Code Telegram Bot
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # Claude Code Telegram Bot: Your Remote AI Coding Assistant
  • highlicense#2
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a LICENSE file in the repository root with the standard MIT License text.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface RichardAtCT/claude-code-telegram
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
ChatGPT App
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. ChatGPT App · recommended 1×
  2. Microsoft Copilot App · recommended 1×
  3. Google Gemini App · recommended 1×
  4. Poe · recommended 1×
  5. Perplexity AI · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I get AI coding assistance for my projects directly from a mobile chat app?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. ChatGPT App
    2. Microsoft Copilot App
    3. Google Gemini App
    4. Poe
    5. Perplexity AI

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named RichardAtCT/claude-code-telegram. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking a conversational AI assistant for code analysis and project notifications via a chat interface.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GitHub Copilot Chat
    2. GitHub Copilot Enterprise
    3. GitLab Duo Chat
    4. CodiumAI
    5. Tabnine Chat
    6. What the Diff
    7. OpenAI GPT-4
    8. Anthropic Claude 3
    9. LangChain (langchain-ai/langchain)
    10. LlamaIndex (run-llama/llama_index)

    AI recommended 10 alternatives but never named RichardAtCT/claude-code-telegram. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of RichardAtCT/claude-code-telegram?
    pass
    AI did not name RichardAtCT/claude-code-telegram — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts RichardAtCT/claude-code-telegram in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named RichardAtCT/claude-code-telegram explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo RichardAtCT/claude-code-telegram solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named RichardAtCT/claude-code-telegram explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of RichardAtCT/claude-code-telegram. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/RichardAtCT/claude-code-telegram.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/RichardAtCT/claude-code-telegram)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/RichardAtCT/claude-code-telegram"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/RichardAtCT/claude-code-telegram.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

RichardAtCT/claude-code-telegram — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite