REPOGEO REPORT · LITE
AgriciDaniel/claude-obsidian
Default branch main · commit 75d3b6fe · scanned 5/20/2026, 9:36:59 AM
GitHub: 5,230 stars · 597 forks
Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.
2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).
Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface AgriciDaniel/claude-obsidian, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.
Action plan — copy-paste fixes
3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.
- highabout#1Update the 'About' description to explicitly state core functions
Why:
CURRENTClaude + Obsidian knowledge companion. Persistent, compounding wiki vault based on Karpathy's LLM Wiki pattern. /wiki /save /autoresearch
COPY-PASTE FIXAn AI-powered second brain and autonomous research agent for Obsidian. Builds a persistent, compounding wiki vault with Claude, based on Karpathy's LLM Wiki pattern. Features /wiki /save /autoresearch commands.
- mediumreadme#2Strengthen the README's opening paragraph with explicit category terms
Why:
CURRENTClaude + Obsidian knowledge companion. A running notetaker that builds and maintains a persistent, compounding wiki vault. Every source you add gets integrated. Every question you ask pulls from everything that has been read. Knowledge compounds like interest. Based on Andrej Karpathy's LLM Wiki pattern. **11 skills. Zero manual filing. Multi-agent support. Optional [DragonScale Memory](docs/dragonscale-guide.md) extension** (log folds, deterministic page addresses, semantic tiling lint, boundary-first autoresearch).
COPY-PASTE FIXAgriciDaniel/claude-obsidian is an AI-powered second brain and autonomous research agent for Obsidian. It functions as a Claude + Obsidian knowledge companion, building and maintaining a persistent, compounding wiki vault based on Andrej Karpathy's LLM Wiki pattern. Every source you add gets integrated, every question pulls from everything read, and knowledge compounds like interest. Features **11 skills, zero manual filing, multi-agent support, and optional [DragonScale Memory](docs/dragonscale-guide.md) extension** (log folds, deterministic page addresses, semantic tiling lint, boundary-first autoresearch).
- lowreadme#3Add a 'Comparison to Alternatives' section in the README
Why:
COPY-PASTE FIXAdd a new section to the README titled 'Comparison to Alternatives' or 'Why Claude-Obsidian?' that highlights its unique features (e.g., Claude AI integration, multi-agent support, DragonScale Memory) compared to other Obsidian AI plugins or general second-brain tools like Mem.ai, Smart Connections, or Text Generator.
Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash
Category visibility — the real GEO test
Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?
Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.
- Obsidian · recommended 2×
- Mem.ai · recommended 1×
- Smart Connections · recommended 1×
- Text Generator · recommended 1×
- Obsidian Memos · recommended 1×
- CATEGORY QUERYSeeking an AI-powered second brain for automatically organizing and retrieving information from documents.you: not recommendedAI recommended (in order):
- Mem.ai
- Obsidian
- Smart Connections
- Text Generator
- Obsidian Memos
- Notion AI
- Logseq
- Readwise Reader
- Ghostreader
- Coda AI
AI recommended 10 alternatives but never named AgriciDaniel/claude-obsidian. This is the gap to close.
Show full AI answer
- CATEGORY QUERYWhat are good options for an autonomous research agent to build a persistent knowledge wiki?you: not recommendedAI recommended (in order):
- MemGPT
- LangChain
- Obsidian
- Dataview
- Excalidraw
- Notion
- MediaWiki
- Confluence
- LlamaIndex
- Serper API
- Beautiful Soup
- Unstructured
- GPT-4
- Claude 3 Opus
AI recommended 14 alternatives but never named AgriciDaniel/claude-obsidian. This is the gap to close.
Show full AI answer
Objective checks
Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.
- Metadata completenesspass
- README presencepass
Self-mention check
Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?
- Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of AgriciDaniel/claude-obsidian?passAI did not name AgriciDaniel/claude-obsidian — likely talking about a different project
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
- If a team adopts AgriciDaniel/claude-obsidian in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?passAI named AgriciDaniel/claude-obsidian explicitly
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
- In one sentence, what problem does the repo AgriciDaniel/claude-obsidian solve, and who is the primary audience?passAI named AgriciDaniel/claude-obsidian explicitly
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
Embed your GEO score
Drop this badge into the README of AgriciDaniel/claude-obsidian. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.
[](https://repogeo.com/en/r/AgriciDaniel/claude-obsidian)<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/AgriciDaniel/claude-obsidian"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/AgriciDaniel/claude-obsidian.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses
AgriciDaniel/claude-obsidian — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.
- Deep reports10 / month
- Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
- Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite