RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

DrizzleTime/Foxel

Default branch main · commit 64fe02c2 · scanned 5/25/2026, 7:47:10 AM

GitHub: 1,032 stars · 95 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface DrizzleTime/Foxel, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Add an explicit 'What is Foxel?' section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section `## What is Foxel?` immediately after the main title, explicitly stating: "Foxel is a highly extensible private cloud storage solution for individuals and teams, featuring AI-powered semantic search. It is *not* a game engine, SQL query builder, or time tracking application. Foxel helps you unify files across various storage backends and find content using natural language."
  • mediumtopics#2
    Expand topics to include more specific category keywords

    Why:

    CURRENT
    ai, cloud, filesystem, image, photo-gallery, photos, python, react, typescript, video
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai, cloud, filesystem, image, photo-gallery, photos, python, react, typescript, video, self-hosted, private-cloud, storage-solution, semantic-search, file-management
  • lowcomparison#3
    Add a 'Comparison with Alternatives' section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section `## 🆚 Comparison with Alternatives` to the README, outlining how Foxel differentiates itself from solutions like Nextcloud, ownCloud, and Seafile, especially regarding AI-powered search and pluggable backends.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface DrizzleTime/Foxel
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
nextcloud/server
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. nextcloud/server · recommended 1×
  2. elastic/elasticsearch · recommended 1×
  3. apache/solr · recommended 1×
  4. owncloud/ocis · recommended 1×
  5. haiwen/seafile · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to self-host a private cloud storage solution with intelligent content search?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Nextcloud (nextcloud/server)
    2. Elasticsearch (elastic/elasticsearch)
    3. Apache Solr (apache/solr)
    4. ownCloud Infinite Scale (oCIS) (owncloud/ocis)
    5. Seafile (haiwen/seafile)
    6. Pydio Cells (pydio/cells)
    7. FileRun (filerun/filerun)
    8. OpenKM (openkm/openkm-core)

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named DrizzleTime/Foxel. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What's a good self-hosted solution for unifying files across various cloud and local storage?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Nextcloud
    2. ownCloud
    3. Seafile
    4. FileBrowser
    5. Pydio Cells

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named DrizzleTime/Foxel. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of DrizzleTime/Foxel?
    pass
    AI named DrizzleTime/Foxel explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts DrizzleTime/Foxel in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named DrizzleTime/Foxel explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo DrizzleTime/Foxel solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named DrizzleTime/Foxel explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of DrizzleTime/Foxel. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/DrizzleTime/Foxel.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/DrizzleTime/Foxel)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/DrizzleTime/Foxel"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/DrizzleTime/Foxel.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

DrizzleTime/Foxel — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite