REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

stepfun-ai/Step1X-Edit

Default branch main · commit 4cca05df · scanned 5/13/2026, 12:37:53 AM

GitHub: 2,202 stars · 98 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE

40 /100

Critical

Category recall

0 / 2

Not recommended in any query

Rule findings

2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail

Objective metadata checks

AI knows your name

3 / 3

Direct prompts that named your repo

HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface stepfun-ai/Step1X-Edit, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION

highreadme#1

Reposition the README's core value proposition to the top

Why:

CURRENT

The README currently starts with alignment divs and links, followed by a 'News' section.

COPY-PASTE FIX

# Step1X-Edit: SOTA Open-Source Image Editing for Commercial-Grade Performance

Step1X-Edit is a state-of-the-art open-source image editing model designed to deliver performance comparable to leading closed-source models like GPT-4o and Gemini 2 Flash. Experience ultra-fast, real-time interactive image generation and editing, completing tasks within 2 seconds.

mediumtopics#2

Expand GitHub topics with specific use cases and differentiators

Why:

CURRENT

image-editing, reasoning, visual-reasoning

COPY-PASTE FIX

image-editing, reasoning, visual-reasoning, real-time-image-editing, sota-image-model, generative-ai-editing, ai-image-generation, commercial-grade-ai

lowcomparison#3

Add a dedicated 'Comparison' section in the README

Why:

COPY-PASTE FIX

## 🚀 Performance Comparison: Step1X-Edit vs. Commercial AI

Step1X-Edit is engineered to rival the capabilities of leading closed-source models. Here's how we compare against models like GPT-4o and Gemini 2 Flash:

*   **Quality:** Achieves comparable visual fidelity and editing precision.
*   **Speed:** Delivers real-time interactive experiences, often completing complex edits within 2 seconds.
*   **Reasoning:** Incorporates advanced visual reasoning for more intelligent and context-aware edits.
*   **Open-Source Advantage:** Provides full transparency, customizability, and community-driven innovation.

(Further details, benchmarks, and examples can be added here.)

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall

0 / 2

0% of queries surface stepfun-ai/Step1X-Edit

Avg rank

—

Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.

Share of voice

Of all named tools, what % are you?

Top rival

Stable Diffusion

Recommended in 2 of 2 queries

COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD

Stable Diffusion · recommended 2×
lllyasviel/ControlNet · recommended 1×
DreamBooth · recommended 1×
LoRAs · recommended 1×
timothybrooks/instruct-pix2pix · recommended 1×

CATEGORY QUERY
What open-source image editing models offer performance similar to commercial AI?
you: not recommended
AI recommended (in order):
1. Stable Diffusion
2. ControlNet (lllyasviel/ControlNet)
3. DreamBooth
4. LoRAs
5. InstructPix2Pix (timothybrooks/instruct-pix2pix)
6. GLIDE
7. DeepFill v2 (JiahuiYu/DeepFillv2)
8. LaMa (saic-md/LaMa)
AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named stepfun-ai/Step1X-Edit. This is the gap to close.
Show full AI answer
CATEGORY QUERY
Seeking a fast open-source model for real-time interactive image generation and editing.
you: not recommended
AI recommended (in order):
1. Stable Diffusion
2. SDXL Turbo
3. LCM-LoRA
4. Automatic1111
5. ComfyUI
6. InstantID
7. ControlNet
8. Kandinsky 2.2
9. PixArt-α
AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named stepfun-ai/Step1X-Edit. This is the gap to close.
Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

Metadata completeness
pass
README presence
pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of stepfun-ai/Step1X-Edit?
pass
AI named stepfun-ai/Step1X-Edit explicitly
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
If a team adopts stepfun-ai/Step1X-Edit in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
pass
AI named stepfun-ai/Step1X-Edit explicitly
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
In one sentence, what problem does the repo stepfun-ai/Step1X-Edit solve, and who is the primary audience?
pass
AI named stepfun-ai/Step1X-Edit explicitly
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of stepfun-ai/Step1X-Edit. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

Live preview

MARKDOWN (README)

[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/stepfun-ai/Step1X-Edit.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/stepfun-ai/Step1X-Edit)

HTML

<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/stepfun-ai/Step1X-Edit"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/stepfun-ai/Step1X-Edit.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>

Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

stepfun-ai/Step1X-Edit — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

Deep reports10 / month
Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite