RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

interpretml/DiCE

Default branch main · commit 8a3aea40 · scanned 6/24/2026, 1:21:45 PM

GitHub: 1,517 stars · 233 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

3 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
90 /100
Healthy
Category recall
2 / 2
Avg rank #2.0 when recommended
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface interpretml/DiCE, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Strengthen README's opening to emphasize diverse counterfactuals

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Diverse Counterfactual Explanations (DiCE) for ML How to explain a machine l
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Diverse Counterfactual Explanations (DiCE) for ML. DiCE stands out by generating *multiple, diverse* counterfactual explanations, offering a richer understanding of model behavior than single explanations or general XAI methods.
  • mediumtopics#2
    Add a topic for 'diverse counterfactuals'

    Why:

    CURRENT
    counterfactual-explanations, deep-learning, explainable-ai, explainable-ml, interpretable-machine-learning, machine-learning, xai
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    counterfactual-explanations, deep-learning, explainable-ai, explainable-ml, interpretable-machine-learning, machine-learning, xai, diverse-counterfactuals
  • mediumcomparison#3
    Add a 'Comparison with other XAI tools' section

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section to the README titled 'Comparison with other XAI tools' that explicitly highlights DiCE's unique focus on generating *diverse* counterfactual explanations, contrasting it with methods that provide single explanations or focus on other aspects of interpretability (e.g., SHAP, LIME).

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
2 / 2
100% of queries surface interpretml/DiCE
Avg rank
#2.0
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
17%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Alibi Explain
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Alibi Explain · recommended 2×
  2. What-If Tool (WIT) · recommended 1×
  3. Counterfactual-GUIDE · recommended 1×
  4. FAT Forensics · recommended 1×
  5. SHAP · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I generate diverse counterfactual explanations to interpret my machine learning model's predictions?
    you: #1
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. DiCE ← you
    2. Alibi Explain
    3. What-If Tool (WIT)
    4. Counterfactual-GUIDE
    5. FAT Forensics
    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools help explain why a deep learning model made a prediction with 'what if' scenarios?
    you: #3
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. SHAP
    2. LIME
    3. DiCE ← you
    4. Alibi Explain
    5. InterpretML
    6. Captum
    7. What-If Tool
    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of interpretml/DiCE?
    pass
    AI named interpretml/DiCE explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts interpretml/DiCE in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named interpretml/DiCE explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo interpretml/DiCE solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named interpretml/DiCE explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of interpretml/DiCE. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/interpretml/DiCE.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/interpretml/DiCE)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/interpretml/DiCE"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/interpretml/DiCE.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

interpretml/DiCE — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite