RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

anthropics/claude-for-legal

Default branch main · commit 4d55f539 · scanned 5/16/2026, 10:33:05 PM

GitHub: 6,413 stars · 880 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface anthropics/claude-for-legal, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add specific topics to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    legal-ai, legal-tech, claude-ai, llm-plugins, ai-governance, contract-review, legal-research, prompt-engineering, legal-workflows, ai-agents
  • highreadme#2
    Refine the README's opening sentence to emphasize its toolkit/framework nature

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Reference agents, skills, and data connectors for the legal workflows we see most — in-house commercial, privacy, product, corporate, employment, litigation, regulatory, AI governance, IP, and the learning side of the practice (law school clinics and students).
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    A comprehensive toolkit and reference framework of agents, skills, and data connectors for building custom legal AI workflows with Claude. Designed for in-house commercial, privacy, product, corporate, employment, litigation, regulatory, AI governance, IP, and legal education applications.
  • mediumabout#3
    Refine the 'About' description to explicitly mention Claude

    Why:

    CURRENT
    A suite of plugins for legal workflows
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    A suite of plugins and reference agents for building legal workflows with Anthropic's Claude.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface anthropics/claude-for-legal
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Kira Systems
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Kira Systems · recommended 2×
  2. Evisort · recommended 2×
  3. CoCounsel · recommended 1×
  4. Harvey AI · recommended 1×
  5. LexisNexis AI · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What AI tools can assist with drafting legal documents and research for attorneys?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. CoCounsel
    2. Harvey AI
    3. LexisNexis AI
    4. Spellbook
    5. Kira Systems
    6. Evisort
    7. ChatGPT Enterprise/Plus

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named anthropics/claude-for-legal. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking AI solutions to streamline contract review and compliance checks in corporate legal departments.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. ContractPodAi
    2. ThoughtTrace
    3. Lexion AI
    4. Evisort
    5. Kira Systems
    6. LinkSquares
    7. Ironclad

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named anthropics/claude-for-legal. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of anthropics/claude-for-legal?
    pass
    AI named anthropics/claude-for-legal explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts anthropics/claude-for-legal in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named anthropics/claude-for-legal explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo anthropics/claude-for-legal solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name anthropics/claude-for-legal — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of anthropics/claude-for-legal. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/anthropics/claude-for-legal.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/anthropics/claude-for-legal)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/anthropics/claude-for-legal"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/anthropics/claude-for-legal.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

anthropics/claude-for-legal — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite