RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

rizethereum/claude-code-requirements-builder

Default branch main · commit 22043e86 · scanned 5/9/2026, 11:12:21 PM

GitHub: 1,761 stars · 172 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
17 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface rizethereum/claude-code-requirements-builder, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highabout#1
    Add a concise description to the About section

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    An AI-powered system for Claude that automates software requirements gathering and documentation through interactive, yes-no questions, designed for both developers and non-technical product managers.
  • mediumreadme#2
    Reposition the README's opening paragraph

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # Claude Requirements Gathering System

An intelligent requirements gathering system for Claude Code that progressively builds context through automated discovery, asks simple yes/no questions, and generates comprehensive requirements documentation.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # Claude AI Requirements Builder: Interactive Code Specification for PMs & Devs

An intelligent, AI-powered system for Claude that automates software requirements gathering and documentation. It progressively builds context through automated code discovery, asks simple yes/no questions, and generates comprehensive, file-path-specific documentation, making it ideal for both developers and non-technical product managers.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface rizethereum/claude-code-requirements-builder
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
GitHub Copilot
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. GitHub Copilot · recommended 1×
  2. GitLab Duo Code Suggestions · recommended 1×
  3. AWS CodeWhisperer · recommended 1×
  4. OpenAI GPT-4 · recommended 1×
  5. Google Gemini · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can AI help automate software requirements gathering and documentation from existing codebases?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GitHub Copilot
    2. GitLab Duo Code Suggestions
    3. AWS CodeWhisperer
    4. OpenAI GPT-4
    5. Google Gemini
    6. Sourcegraph
    7. Cody AI
    8. PlantUML
    9. Mermaid.js
    10. Doxygen
    11. Javadoc
    12. Sphinx
    13. Google's Code Search

    AI recommended 13 alternatives but never named rizethereum/claude-code-requirements-builder. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Tool for non-technical product managers to define software requirements using simple questions?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Trello
    2. Jira Product Discovery
    3. Aha!
    4. ClickUp
    5. Notion
    6. Miro
    7. Google Forms
    8. Microsoft Forms

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named rizethereum/claude-code-requirements-builder. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of rizethereum/claude-code-requirements-builder?
    pass
    AI did not name rizethereum/claude-code-requirements-builder — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts rizethereum/claude-code-requirements-builder in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named rizethereum/claude-code-requirements-builder explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo rizethereum/claude-code-requirements-builder solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name rizethereum/claude-code-requirements-builder — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of rizethereum/claude-code-requirements-builder. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/rizethereum/claude-code-requirements-builder.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/rizethereum/claude-code-requirements-builder)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/rizethereum/claude-code-requirements-builder"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/rizethereum/claude-code-requirements-builder.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

rizethereum/claude-code-requirements-builder — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite