RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

BytePioneer-AI/openclaw-china

Default branch main · commit d60c4d91 · scanned 5/27/2026, 1:47:35 PM

GitHub: 3,936 stars · 344 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface BytePioneer-AI/openclaw-china, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README H1 to explicitly state AI assistant integration

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # 🦞 OpenClaw China — China IM Channels
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # 🦞 OpenClaw China — AI Assistant Integration for Chinese IM Platforms
  • highlicense#2
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a new file named `LICENSE` in the repository root with the content of the MIT License (or your chosen open-source license).
  • mediumhomepage#3
    Add a homepage URL to the repository's 'About' section

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Set the homepage URL in the repository's 'About' section to `https://github.com/BytePioneer-AI/openclaw-china` (or a dedicated documentation site if one exists).

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface BytePioneer-AI/openclaw-china
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
WeChat
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. WeChat · recommended 1×
  2. Official Account (公众号) API · recommended 1×
  3. Mini Programs (小程序) · recommended 1×
  4. Enterprise WeChat (企业微信) · recommended 1×
  5. QQ · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to integrate an AI assistant with popular Chinese instant messaging platforms?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. WeChat
    2. Official Account (公众号) API
    3. Mini Programs (小程序)
    4. Enterprise WeChat (企业微信)
    5. QQ
    6. QQ Bot API
    7. SmartQQ
    8. QQNT
    9. QQ Official Accounts (QQ公众号)
    10. Douyin (抖音)
    11. Kuaishou (快手)
    12. Douyin Open Platform (抖音开放平台)
    13. Kuaishou Open Platform (快手开放平台)
    14. DingTalk (钉钉)
    15. DingTalk Open Platform (钉钉开放平台)
    16. Feishu (飞书)
    17. Lark
    18. Feishu Open Platform (飞书开放平台)

    AI recommended 18 alternatives but never named BytePioneer-AI/openclaw-china. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools help deploy AI agents on major Chinese corporate communication platforms?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. WeChat Official Account Platform
    2. WeCom
    3. DingTalk Open Platform
    4. Baidu Unit
    5. Tencent Cloud
    6. Alibaba Cloud
    7. Rasa
    8. Microsoft Azure Bot Service

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named BytePioneer-AI/openclaw-china. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of BytePioneer-AI/openclaw-china?
    pass
    AI named BytePioneer-AI/openclaw-china explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts BytePioneer-AI/openclaw-china in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named BytePioneer-AI/openclaw-china explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo BytePioneer-AI/openclaw-china solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name BytePioneer-AI/openclaw-china — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of BytePioneer-AI/openclaw-china. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/BytePioneer-AI/openclaw-china.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/BytePioneer-AI/openclaw-china)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/BytePioneer-AI/openclaw-china"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/BytePioneer-AI/openclaw-china.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

BytePioneer-AI/openclaw-china — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite