RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

Vision-CAIR/MiniGPT4-video

Default branch main · commit 596adcb0 · scanned 5/31/2026, 9:18:11 AM

GitHub: 639 stars · 70 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
33 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface Vision-CAIR/MiniGPT4-video, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README opening to emphasize multimodal LLM nature

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # [ECCV 2024 Accepted]Goldfish: Vision-Language Understanding of Arbitrarily Long Videos
    # [CVPR2024W]MiniGPT4-Video: Advancing Multimodal LLMs for Video Understanding with Interleaved Visual-Textual Tokens
    **This repo contains the codes for MiniGPT4-video for short video understanding and Goldfish for long video understanding.**
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    This repository presents Goldfish and MiniGPT4-video, two state-of-the-art multimodal Large Language Models (LLMs) designed for comprehensive video understanding, covering both arbitrarily long and short video content. Goldfish (ECCV 2024 Accepted) focuses on long videos, while MiniGPT4-video (CVPR2024W) advances multimodal LLMs for short video understanding with interleaved visual-textual tokens.
  • mediumtopics#2
    Add specific multimodal LLM topics

    Why:

    CURRENT
    long-video-understanding, video-question-answering, video-retrieval, video-understanding
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    long-video-understanding, video-question-answering, video-retrieval, video-understanding, multimodal-llm, large-language-models, video-llm, vision-language-model
  • lowhomepage#3
    Update homepage to reflect MiniGPT4-video project page

    Why:

    CURRENT
    https://vision-cair.github.io/Goldfish_website/
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://vision-cair.github.io/MiniGPT4-video/

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface Vision-CAIR/MiniGPT4-video
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
FFmpeg
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. FFmpeg · recommended 2×
  2. OpenCV · recommended 2×
  3. PyTorch · recommended 2×
  4. TensorFlow · recommended 2×
  5. Hugging Face Transformers · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I build a system for comprehensive understanding and analysis of very long video content?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. FFmpeg
    2. OpenCV
    3. Hugging Face Transformers
    4. Whisper
    5. GPT-4
    6. OpenAI API
    7. Claude
    8. Anthropic API
    9. Llama 3
    10. CLIP
    11. BLIP
    12. PyTorch
    13. TensorFlow
    14. Elasticsearch
    15. Apache Kafka
    16. Grafana
    17. Kibana

    AI recommended 17 alternatives but never named Vision-CAIR/MiniGPT4-video. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools help develop AI models for question answering based on video content?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. PyTorch
    2. TensorFlow
    3. Transformers (Hugging Face)
    4. OpenCV
    5. MMAction2
    6. Detectron2
    7. FAISS
    8. SpaCy
    9. NLTK
    10. FFmpeg

    AI recommended 10 alternatives but never named Vision-CAIR/MiniGPT4-video. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of Vision-CAIR/MiniGPT4-video?
    pass
    AI did not name Vision-CAIR/MiniGPT4-video — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts Vision-CAIR/MiniGPT4-video in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named Vision-CAIR/MiniGPT4-video explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo Vision-CAIR/MiniGPT4-video solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named Vision-CAIR/MiniGPT4-video explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of Vision-CAIR/MiniGPT4-video. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/Vision-CAIR/MiniGPT4-video.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/Vision-CAIR/MiniGPT4-video)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/Vision-CAIR/MiniGPT4-video"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/Vision-CAIR/MiniGPT4-video.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

Vision-CAIR/MiniGPT4-video — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite