RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

microsoft/SEAL

Default branch main · commit 02a5c345 · scanned 7/1/2026, 11:31:30 AM

GitHub: 3,989 stars · 773 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
73 /100
Needs work
Category recall
1 / 2
Avg rank #1.0 when recommended
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface microsoft/SEAL, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highhomepage#1
    Update the repository's homepage URL to the project's dedicated site

    Why:

    CURRENT
    https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/group/cryptography-research/
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://sealcrypto.org
  • mediumreadme#2
    Emphasize 'performant' in the README's opening sentence

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # Microsoft SEAL

Microsoft SEAL is an easy-to-use open-source ([MIT licensed](LICENSE)) homomorphic encryption library developed by the Cryptography Research Group at Microsoft.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # Microsoft SEAL

Microsoft SEAL is a highly performant, easy-to-use open-source ([MIT licensed](LICENSE)) homomorphic encryption library developed by the Cryptography Research Group at Microsoft.
  • lowtopics#3
    Add 'performance' to the repository topics

    Why:

    CURRENT
    cryptography, encryption, homomorphic-encryption
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    cryptography, encryption, homomorphic-encryption, performance

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
1 / 2
50% of queries surface microsoft/SEAL
Avg rank
#1.0
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
5%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
homenc/HElib
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. homenc/HElib · recommended 1×
  2. tfhe/tfhe · recommended 1×
  3. Intel SGX · recommended 1×
  4. AMD SEV-SNP · recommended 1×
  5. AWS Nitro Enclaves · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to process sensitive data in the cloud while keeping it fully encrypted?
    you: #1
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Microsoft SEAL (microsoft/SEAL) ← you
    2. IBM HElib (homenc/HElib)
    3. Google's TFHEr (tfhe/tfhe)
    4. Intel SGX
    5. AMD SEV-SNP
    6. AWS Nitro Enclaves
    7. Azure Confidential Computing
    8. Sharemind
    9. FHE.org's MPC-as-a-Service
    10. CryptDB (cryptdb/cryptdb)
    11. Mylar (mylarproject/mylar)
    12. AWS Clean Rooms
    13. Google Cloud Secure Data Clean Rooms
    14. Snowflake Data Clean Rooms
    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking a performant C++ library for homomorphic encryption to build secure applications.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Microsoft SEAL
    2. PALISADE
    3. HElib
    4. Lattigo
    5. TFHE

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named microsoft/SEAL. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of microsoft/SEAL?
    pass
    AI named microsoft/SEAL explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts microsoft/SEAL in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named microsoft/SEAL explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo microsoft/SEAL solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named microsoft/SEAL explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of microsoft/SEAL. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/microsoft/SEAL.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/microsoft/SEAL)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/microsoft/SEAL"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/microsoft/SEAL.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

microsoft/SEAL — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite