RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

sdcb/chats

Default branch main · commit 6c48f6ad · scanned 6/16/2026, 4:46:48 PM

GitHub: 591 stars · 101 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface sdcb/chats, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's opening to clarify project type

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Ensure the `README_EN.md` starts with a clear statement like: 'Sdcb Chats is a powerful, self-hosted AI gateway and flexible frontend for large language models, supporting 22+ mainstream AI model providers.'
  • mediumtopics#2
    Expand repository topics with relevant keywords

    Why:

    CURRENT
    ai, chatglm, chatgpt-api, dashscope, deepseek, deepseek-r1, dotnet, llm, moonshot, openai-api, react
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai, chatglm, chatgpt-api, dashscope, deepseek, deepseek-r1, dotnet, llm, moonshot, openai-api, react, ai-gateway, llm-frontend, self-hosted, code-interpreter, llm-orchestration, multi-llm
  • lowcomparison#3
    Add a comparison section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section to the README titled 'Comparison with Alternatives' or 'Why Sdcb Chats?' that briefly outlines how it compares to common AI gateways and LLM frontends like LiteLLM, OpenRouter, Open WebUI, or even cloud services like Azure AI Studio/AWS Bedrock.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface sdcb/chats
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Azure AI Studio
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Azure AI Studio · recommended 1×
  2. AWS Bedrock · recommended 1×
  3. LiteLLM · recommended 1×
  4. OpenRouter · recommended 1×
  5. Portkey.ai · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for an AI gateway to consolidate multiple large language model APIs securely.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Azure AI Studio
    2. AWS Bedrock
    3. LiteLLM
    4. OpenRouter
    5. Portkey.ai
    6. Helicone
    7. LangChain

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named sdcb/chats. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What is a good self-hosted frontend for diverse LLMs with built-in code interpreter?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Open WebUI (open-webui/open-webui)
    2. LocalAI (mudler/LocalAI)
    3. Chatbot UI (mckaywrigley/chatbot-ui)
    4. Streamlit (streamlit/streamlit)
    5. LangChain (langchain-ai/langchain)
    6. Gradio (gradio-app/gradio)
    7. LlamaIndex (run-llama/llama_index)
    8. FlowiseAI (FlowiseAI/Flowise)

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named sdcb/chats. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of sdcb/chats?
    pass
    AI named sdcb/chats explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts sdcb/chats in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named sdcb/chats explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo sdcb/chats solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named sdcb/chats explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of sdcb/chats. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/sdcb/chats.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/sdcb/chats)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/sdcb/chats"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/sdcb/chats.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

sdcb/chats — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite
sdcb/chats — RepoGEO report