RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

M507/RamiGPT

Default branch master · commit f8e3ea76 · scanned 6/8/2026, 12:17:25 PM

GitHub: 858 stars · 193 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface M507/RamiGPT, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Clarify RamiGPT's core function and domain in the README's opening

    Why:

    CURRENT
    **RamiGPT** is an AI-powered offensive security agent designed to pwn root accounts.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    **RamiGPT** is a specialized AI-powered offensive security agent, *not a general-purpose language model*, designed to autonomously pwn root accounts through privilege escalation.
  • mediumabout#2
    Refine the repository description to emphasize its offensive security focus

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Autonomous Privilege Escalation using AI
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    An AI-powered offensive security agent for autonomous privilege escalation and gaining root access in hacking scenarios.
  • lowhomepage#3
    Add a project homepage URL

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://M507.github.io/RamiGPT

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface M507/RamiGPT
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Metasploit Framework
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Metasploit Framework · recommended 2×
  2. Pwnagotchi · recommended 2×
  3. BloodHound · recommended 1×
  4. OpenAI Gym · recommended 1×
  5. Stable Baselines3 · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I automate privilege escalation in hacking scenarios using AI?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Metasploit Framework
    2. BloodHound
    3. OpenAI Gym
    4. Stable Baselines3
    5. Nmap
    6. Pwnagotchi
    7. scikit-learn
    8. TensorFlow
    9. PyTorch

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named M507/RamiGPT. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What AI-powered tools exist for autonomous penetration testing and gaining root access?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Metasploit Framework
    2. OpenAI GPT-3/GPT-4
    3. BlackMamba
    4. Prowler
    5. Immunity Canvas
    6. Pwnagotchi

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named M507/RamiGPT. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of M507/RamiGPT?
    pass
    AI named M507/RamiGPT explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts M507/RamiGPT in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named M507/RamiGPT explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo M507/RamiGPT solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named M507/RamiGPT explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of M507/RamiGPT. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/M507/RamiGPT.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/M507/RamiGPT)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/M507/RamiGPT"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/M507/RamiGPT.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

M507/RamiGPT — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite