REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

miroslavpejic85/mirotalksfu

Default branch main · commit bc7570c0 · scanned 6/30/2026, 5:02:12 AM

GitHub: 3,019 stars · 481 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE

40 /100

Critical

Category recall

0 / 2

Not recommended in any query

Rule findings

2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail

Objective metadata checks

AI knows your name

3 / 3

Direct prompts that named your repo

HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface miroslavpejic85/mirotalksfu, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION

highreadme#1

Add explicit target audience to README's opening statement

Why:

CURRENT

Self-hosted, open-source WebRTC video conferencing platform for real-time communication and collaboration at scale.

COPY-PASTE FIX

Self-hosted, open-source WebRTC video conferencing platform for robust real-time communication and collaboration for large teams and enterprises.

mediumtopics#2

Add topics to clarify its role as a platform for custom RTC applications

Why:

CURRENT

ai, collaboration, docker, file-sharing, live-streaming, mediasoup, mirotalk, nodejs, open-source, real-time-communication, rest-api, rtmp, screen-sharing, self-hosted, video-chat, video-conferencing, webrtc, webrtc-sfu, websocket, whiteboard

COPY-PASTE FIX

ai, collaboration, docker, file-sharing, live-streaming, mediasoup, mirotalk, nodejs, open-source, real-time-communication, rest-api, rtmp, screen-sharing, self-hosted, video-chat, video-conferencing, webrtc, webrtc-sfu, websocket, whiteboard, rtc-platform, custom-rtc-applications, developer-platform

lowabout#3

Incorporate 'scalable' into the repository description

Why:

CURRENT

🏆 Self-hosted, open-source WebRTC video conferencing platform for real-time communication and collaboration. A modern alternative to Zoom, built on SFU architecture.

COPY-PASTE FIX

🏆 Self-hosted, open-source, and scalable WebRTC video conferencing platform for real-time communication and collaboration. A modern alternative to Zoom, built on SFU architecture.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall

0 / 2

0% of queries surface miroslavpejic85/mirotalksfu

Avg rank

—

Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.

Share of voice

Of all named tools, what % are you?

Top rival

Jitsi Meet

Recommended in 1 of 2 queries

COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD

Jitsi Meet · recommended 1×
BigBlueButton · recommended 1×
Nextcloud Talk · recommended 1×
Mattermost · recommended 1×
OpenVidu · recommended 1×

CATEGORY QUERY
What are robust self-hosted open-source video conferencing solutions for large teams?
you: not recommended
AI recommended (in order):
1. Jitsi Meet
2. BigBlueButton
3. Nextcloud Talk
4. Mattermost
5. OpenVidu
AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named miroslavpejic85/mirotalksfu. This is the gap to close.
Show full AI answer
CATEGORY QUERY
Looking for a scalable WebRTC SFU platform for custom real-time communication applications.
you: not recommended
AI recommended (in order):
1. Mediasoup
2. Janus WebRTC Server
3. Pion/ion-sfu
4. LiveKit
5. Kurento Media Server
AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named miroslavpejic85/mirotalksfu. This is the gap to close.
Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

Metadata completeness
pass
README presence
pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of miroslavpejic85/mirotalksfu?
pass
AI named miroslavpejic85/mirotalksfu explicitly
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
If a team adopts miroslavpejic85/mirotalksfu in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
pass
AI named miroslavpejic85/mirotalksfu explicitly
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
In one sentence, what problem does the repo miroslavpejic85/mirotalksfu solve, and who is the primary audience?
pass
AI named miroslavpejic85/mirotalksfu explicitly
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of miroslavpejic85/mirotalksfu. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

Live preview

MARKDOWN (README)

[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/miroslavpejic85/mirotalksfu.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/miroslavpejic85/mirotalksfu)

HTML

<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/miroslavpejic85/mirotalksfu"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/miroslavpejic85/mirotalksfu.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>

Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

miroslavpejic85/mirotalksfu — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

Deep reports10 / month
Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite