RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

LigphiDonk/academic-figure-generator

Default branch main · commit 0a2bec6b · scanned 6/12/2026, 8:56:59 AM

GitHub: 957 stars · 74 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface LigphiDonk/academic-figure-generator, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README H1 to emphasize AI-driven content analysis

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # Academic Figure Generator
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # Academic Figure Generator: AI-Powered Scientific Diagram Creation from Paper Content
  • mediumhomepage#2
    Add a homepage URL to the repository metadata

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a URL to a live demo, project website, or even the GitHub Pages for the repo.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface LigphiDonk/academic-figure-generator
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
plotly/plotly.py
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. plotly/plotly.py · recommended 1×
  2. plotly/dash · recommended 1×
  3. matplotlib/matplotlib · recommended 1×
  4. mwaskom/seaborn · recommended 1×
  5. ChatGPT · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to automatically generate high-quality scientific figures from academic papers using AI?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Plotly (plotly/plotly.py)
    2. Dash (plotly/dash)
    3. Matplotlib (matplotlib/matplotlib)
    4. Seaborn (mwaskom/seaborn)
    5. ChatGPT
    6. GPT-4
    7. Code Interpreter
    8. Advanced Data Analysis
    9. Midjourney
    10. DALL-E 3
    11. Adobe Illustrator
    12. Generative Recolor
    13. DeepMotion
    14. RunwayML

    AI recommended 14 alternatives but never named LigphiDonk/academic-figure-generator. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Tool to analyze research paper content and generate prompts for custom diagrams?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. ChatGPT Plus / GPT-4
    2. Claude 3 Opus / Sonnet
    3. Elicit.org
    4. Semantic Scholar
    5. Scite.ai
    6. Obsidian
    7. Humata AI

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named LigphiDonk/academic-figure-generator. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of LigphiDonk/academic-figure-generator?
    pass
    AI did not name LigphiDonk/academic-figure-generator — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts LigphiDonk/academic-figure-generator in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named LigphiDonk/academic-figure-generator explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo LigphiDonk/academic-figure-generator solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named LigphiDonk/academic-figure-generator explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of LigphiDonk/academic-figure-generator. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/LigphiDonk/academic-figure-generator.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/LigphiDonk/academic-figure-generator)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/LigphiDonk/academic-figure-generator"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/LigphiDonk/academic-figure-generator.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

LigphiDonk/academic-figure-generator — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite
LigphiDonk/academic-figure-generator — RepoGEO report