RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

getclawe/clawe

Default branch main · commit 3214feda · scanned 6/2/2026, 8:06:52 AM

GitHub: 728 stars · 84 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface getclawe/clawe, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Explicitly clarify Clawe's purpose as an AI agent system and differentiate from desktop management tools

    Why:

    CURRENT
    <p><strong>A multi-agent coordination system powered by <a href="https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw">OpenClaw</a>.</strong></p>
  <p>Deploy a team of AI agents that work together, each with their own identity, workspace, and scheduled heartbeats. Coordinate tasks, share context, and deliver notifications in near real-time.</p>
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    <p><strong>Clawe is a multi-agent coordination system powered by <a href="https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw">OpenClaw</a>. It is NOT a desktop environment manager or a personal workflow tool.</strong></p>
  <p>Deploy a team of AI agents that work together, each with their own identity, workspace, and scheduled heartbeats. Coordinate tasks, share context, and deliver notifications in near real-time.</p>
  • mediumreadme#2
    Add a 'Why Clawe?' or 'Comparison' section to position against top competitors

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section, e.g., '## Why Clawe? (vs. CrewAI, AutoGen, LangChain)' or '## Clawe vs. Other Agent Frameworks' that highlights Clawe's unique approach to multi-agent coordination, task management, and real-time collaboration, explicitly mentioning the problem space covered by the top competitors.
  • lowtopics#3
    Expand repository topics with broader AI agent and task management keywords

    Why:

    CURRENT
    ai-agents, ai-assistant, claude-code, clawbot, openclaw
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai-agents, ai-assistant, claude-code, clawbot, openclaw, multi-agent-system, agent-orchestration, ai-collaboration, task-management

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface getclawe/clawe
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
CrewAI
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. CrewAI · recommended 2×
  2. AutoGen · recommended 2×
  3. LangChain · recommended 2×
  4. Haystack · recommended 2×
  5. OpenAI Assistants API · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I set up a system for multiple AI agents to collaborate on tasks?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. CrewAI
    2. AutoGen
    3. LangChain
    4. Haystack
    5. OpenAI Assistants API

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named getclawe/clawe. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools help manage a team of AI agents with shared context and task assignments?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. AutoGen
    3. CrewAI
    4. Haystack
    5. LlamaIndex
    6. Kubernetes
    7. Apache Kafka

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named getclawe/clawe. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of getclawe/clawe?
    pass
    AI named getclawe/clawe explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts getclawe/clawe in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named getclawe/clawe explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo getclawe/clawe solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named getclawe/clawe explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of getclawe/clawe. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/getclawe/clawe.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/getclawe/clawe)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/getclawe/clawe"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/getclawe/clawe.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

getclawe/clawe — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite