RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

bohyy/academic-ai-prompt

Default branch main · commit 3b5128f3 · scanned 5/27/2026, 9:37:42 AM

GitHub: 1,052 stars · 64 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface bohyy/academic-ai-prompt, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's opening to clarify project type

    Why:

    CURRENT
    > **一套为研究生和学术研究者设计的完整AI Prompt库**
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    > **一套为研究生和学术研究者设计的完整AI Prompt库，专注于提供即插即用的AI提示词和系统化工作流，而非通用AI工具或研究平台。**
  • highabout#2
    Add a homepage URL to the repository's About section

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/bohyy/academic-ai-prompt
  • mediumtopics#3
    Add more specific topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    CURRENT
    academic-research, ai, ai-prompts, ailearning, knowledge-base, open-source, paper-writing, productivity, prompt-engineering, research-tools, research-workflows
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    academic-research, ai, ai-prompts, ailearning, knowledge-base, open-source, paper-writing, productivity, prompt-engineering, research-tools, research-workflows, prompt-library, academic-writing, thesis-writing, student-resources

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface bohyy/academic-ai-prompt
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
ChatGPT
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. ChatGPT · recommended 2×
  2. Elicit · recommended 2×
  3. Connected Papers · recommended 2×
  4. Scite.ai · recommended 2×
  5. Semantic Scholar · recommended 2×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What AI-driven methods can accelerate academic thesis topic generation and research workflow?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. ChatGPT
    2. Elicit
    3. Connected Papers
    4. ResearchRabbit
    5. Scite.ai
    6. Semantic Scholar
    7. QuillBot
    8. Zotero
    9. Mendeley

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named bohyy/academic-ai-prompt. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking AI prompts to structure literature reviews and optimize academic paper drafts.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. ChatGPT
    2. Claude
    3. Gemini
    4. Elicit
    5. Semantic Scholar
    6. Scite.ai
    7. Connected Papers
    8. Perplexity AI
    9. Consensus
    10. Grammarly Business
    11. ProWritingAid
    12. QuillBot
    13. Wordtune
    14. Trinka AI
    15. Writefull

    AI recommended 15 alternatives but never named bohyy/academic-ai-prompt. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of bohyy/academic-ai-prompt?
    pass
    AI named bohyy/academic-ai-prompt explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts bohyy/academic-ai-prompt in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named bohyy/academic-ai-prompt explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo bohyy/academic-ai-prompt solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name bohyy/academic-ai-prompt — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of bohyy/academic-ai-prompt. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/bohyy/academic-ai-prompt.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/bohyy/academic-ai-prompt)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/bohyy/academic-ai-prompt"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/bohyy/academic-ai-prompt.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

bohyy/academic-ai-prompt — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite