RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

yingchengyang/Reinforcement-Learning-Papers

Default branch main · commit eac64e1e · scanned 6/1/2026, 11:37:41 AM

GitHub: 571 stars · 42 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
22 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface yingchengyang/Reinforcement-Learning-Papers, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README's opening sentence to clarify the repo's nature

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Related papers for Reinforcement Learning (we mainly focus on single-agent).
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    This GitHub repository provides a curated collection of insightful research papers on Reinforcement Learning, primarily focusing on single-agent methods.
  • mediumreadme#2
    Add a sentence highlighting the unique inline summaries feature

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Each paper entry includes a direct link to the source and a brief, inline summary to quickly grasp its core contribution.
  • lowhomepage#3
    Add the repository URL as the homepage

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/yingchengyang/Reinforcement-Learning-Papers

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface yingchengyang/Reinforcement-Learning-Papers
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Papers With Code
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Papers With Code · recommended 1×
  2. arXiv Sanity Preserver · recommended 1×
  3. RL Theory · recommended 1×
  4. The Batch · recommended 1×
  5. Twitter · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Where can I find a curated list of recent reinforcement learning research papers?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Papers With Code
    2. arXiv Sanity Preserver
    3. RL Theory
    4. The Batch
    5. Twitter
    6. Reddit

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named yingchengyang/Reinforcement-Learning-Papers. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are the foundational and current research trends in model-based reinforcement learning?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Gaussian Processes
    2. Bayesian Neural Networks
    3. Neural Networks
    4. MLPs
    5. LSTMs
    6. Transformers
    7. Model Predictive Control
    8. Random Shooting
    9. Cross-Entropy Method
    10. Model Predictive Path Integral
    11. Monte Carlo Tree Search
    12. AlphaGo
    13. Variational Inference
    14. Monte Carlo Dropout
    15. Dyna-style algorithms
    16. Model-Based Value Expansion (MVE)
    17. World Models
    18. DreamerV3
    19. Model-Based Policy Optimization (MBPO)
    20. Foundation Models

    AI recommended 20 alternatives but never named yingchengyang/Reinforcement-Learning-Papers. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of yingchengyang/Reinforcement-Learning-Papers?
    pass
    AI named yingchengyang/Reinforcement-Learning-Papers explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts yingchengyang/Reinforcement-Learning-Papers in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI did not name yingchengyang/Reinforcement-Learning-Papers — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo yingchengyang/Reinforcement-Learning-Papers solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name yingchengyang/Reinforcement-Learning-Papers — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of yingchengyang/Reinforcement-Learning-Papers. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/yingchengyang/Reinforcement-Learning-Papers.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/yingchengyang/Reinforcement-Learning-Papers)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/yingchengyang/Reinforcement-Learning-Papers"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/yingchengyang/Reinforcement-Learning-Papers.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

yingchengyang/Reinforcement-Learning-Papers — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite