REPOGEO REPORT · LITE
nlpxucan/WizardLM
Default branch main · commit cd4b4cc0 · scanned 5/14/2026, 11:46:42 PM
GitHub: 9,483 stars · 749 forks
Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface nlpxucan/WizardLM, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.
Action plan — copy-paste fixes
2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.
- highlicense#1Clarify the project's licensing terms in the README
Why:
COPY-PASTE FIXAdd a section like '## Licensing' to your README, explicitly stating the license(s) under which WizardLM and its components (e.g., models, data) are distributed, referencing any inherited licenses from projects like Stanford Alpaca or LLaMA.
- mediumhomepage#2Set the repository homepage URL
Why:
COPY-PASTE FIXhttps://wizardlm.github.io/
Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash
Category visibility — the real GEO test
Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?
Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.
- Llama 3 · recommended 2×
- Mixtral 8x7B Instruct · recommended 1×
- Gemma · recommended 1×
- Mistral 7B Instruct · recommended 1×
- Zephyr · recommended 1×
- CATEGORY QUERYWhat open-source large language models excel at following complex, nuanced instructions?you: not recommendedAI recommended (in order):
- Llama 3
- Mixtral 8x7B Instruct
- Gemma
- Mistral 7B Instruct
- Zephyr
- OpenHermes 2.5
AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named nlpxucan/WizardLM. This is the gap to close.
Show full AI answer
- CATEGORY QUERYLooking for an LLM that can generate high-quality code and solve advanced mathematical problems.you: not recommendedAI recommended (in order):
- GPT-4
- Claude 3 Opus
- Gemini 1.5 Pro
- Llama 3
- Code Llama
AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named nlpxucan/WizardLM. This is the gap to close.
Show full AI answer
Objective checks
Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.
- Metadata completenessfail
Suggestion:
- README presencepass
Self-mention check
Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?
- Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of nlpxucan/WizardLM?passAI did not name nlpxucan/WizardLM — likely talking about a different project
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
- If a team adopts nlpxucan/WizardLM in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?passAI named nlpxucan/WizardLM explicitly
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
- In one sentence, what problem does the repo nlpxucan/WizardLM solve, and who is the primary audience?passAI named nlpxucan/WizardLM explicitly
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
Embed your GEO score
Drop this badge into the README of nlpxucan/WizardLM. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.
[](https://repogeo.com/en/r/nlpxucan/WizardLM)<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/nlpxucan/WizardLM"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/nlpxucan/WizardLM.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses
nlpxucan/WizardLM — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.
- Deep reports10 / month
- Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
- Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite