RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

Shpigford/chops

Default branch main · commit 1a1ff0de · scanned 5/13/2026, 6:41:25 PM

GitHub: 1,327 stars · 81 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
40 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface Shpigford/chops, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highabout#1
    Strengthen the 'About' description to prevent name collision

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Your AI agent skills, finally organized. A macOS app to browse, edit, and manage skills across Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Windsurf, and Amp.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Chops: A native macOS desktop app to organize, edit, and manage your AI agent skills across Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Windsurf, and Amp.
  • highreadme#2
    Add a 'Why Chops?' section to clarify its unique role

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section to the README, perhaps after 'Features':

## Why Chops?

Chops is not another AI framework like LangChain or LlamaIndex, nor is it a general-purpose note-taking app like Obsidian. Instead, Chops is a dedicated macOS desktop application designed specifically to be your central hub for managing the *configurations and skills* of your existing AI coding assistants. It helps you organize, edit, and discover skills across multiple tools in one place, freeing you from digging through dotfiles and disparate directories.
  • lowreadme#3
    Clarify the project's license in the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a section or line to the README, e.g., under a 'License' heading or in the footer:

## License

This project is licensed under [describe the actual license(s) present in the LICENSE file, e.g., 'a custom license combining elements of X and Y']. Please refer to the `LICENSE` file for full details.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface Shpigford/chops
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
LangChain
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. LangChain · recommended 1×
  2. LlamaIndex · recommended 1×
  3. GitHub · recommended 1×
  4. GitLab · recommended 1×
  5. Weights & Biases Prompts · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I efficiently manage and edit my AI coding assistant skills across multiple platforms?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. LlamaIndex
    3. GitHub
    4. GitLab
    5. Weights & Biases Prompts
    6. Humanloop
    7. Vellum
    8. AWS API Gateway
    9. Lambda
    10. Azure API Management
    11. Functions
    12. Google Cloud Endpoints
    13. Cloud Functions
    14. Docker
    15. Kubernetes
    16. OpenAI Assistants API
    17. GitHub Actions
    18. GitLab CI/CD
    19. AWS ECS
    20. Google Cloud Run
    21. Azure Container Instances

    AI recommended 21 alternatives but never named Shpigford/chops. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a macOS application to organize and browse my developer AI agent configurations.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Obsidian
    2. Craft
    3. DEVONthink 3
    4. NotePlan 3
    5. Bear
    6. Visual Studio Code
    7. Finder

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named Shpigford/chops. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of Shpigford/chops?
    pass
    AI named Shpigford/chops explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts Shpigford/chops in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named Shpigford/chops explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo Shpigford/chops solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named Shpigford/chops explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of Shpigford/chops. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/Shpigford/chops.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/Shpigford/chops)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/Shpigford/chops"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/Shpigford/chops.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

Shpigford/chops — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite