RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

aiwithremy/claude-skills-llm-council

Default branch main · commit 55ee36e8 · scanned 6/15/2026, 7:28:09 PM

GitHub: 591 stars · 66 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
23 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface aiwithremy/claude-skills-llm-council, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Clarify the README's opening statement to emphasize user application

    Why:

    CURRENT
    A Claude skill that turns one question into five expert opinions, plus a final verdict.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    This Claude skill acts as your personal AI decision-making assistant, providing diverse, peer-reviewed perspectives from five expert AI advisors to help you solve complex problems and make better decisions.
  • hightopics#2
    Add specific topics to improve categorization

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    claude-skill, llm-council, decision-making, problem-solving, ai-advisors, peer-review, anthropic-claude, ai-assistant
  • highlicense#3
    Add a standard open-source license file

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a LICENSE file in the repository root containing the text of the MIT License.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface aiwithremy/claude-skills-llm-council
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
ChatGPT
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. ChatGPT · recommended 1×
  2. Claude · recommended 1×
  3. Gemini · recommended 1×
  4. Llama · recommended 1×
  5. IBM Watson Discovery · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I get diverse AI perspectives for complex decision-making and problem-solving?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. ChatGPT
    2. Claude
    3. Gemini
    4. Llama
    5. IBM Watson Discovery
    6. Palantir Foundry
    7. Hugging Face Transformers (huggingface/transformers)
    8. AnyLogic
    9. NetLogo

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named aiwithremy/claude-skills-llm-council. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools provide AI-driven peer review to synthesize multiple expert opinions on a topic?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Elicit
    2. Scite.ai
    3. Iris.ai
    4. Semantic Scholar
    5. ResearchRabbit

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named aiwithremy/claude-skills-llm-council. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of aiwithremy/claude-skills-llm-council?
    pass
    AI named aiwithremy/claude-skills-llm-council explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts aiwithremy/claude-skills-llm-council in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named aiwithremy/claude-skills-llm-council explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo aiwithremy/claude-skills-llm-council solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name aiwithremy/claude-skills-llm-council — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of aiwithremy/claude-skills-llm-council. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/aiwithremy/claude-skills-llm-council.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/aiwithremy/claude-skills-llm-council)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/aiwithremy/claude-skills-llm-council"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/aiwithremy/claude-skills-llm-council.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

aiwithremy/claude-skills-llm-council — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite