RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

hank9999/kiro.rs

Default branch master · commit f1bbe9f1 · scanned 5/20/2026, 10:12:29 AM

GitHub: 1,467 stars · 399 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface hank9999/kiro.rs, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highabout#1
    Update repository description to accurately reflect its purpose

    Why:

    CURRENT
    A Kiro Client in Rust
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    A Rust proxy service that translates Anthropic Claude API requests to Kiro API requests, with features like token refresh and multi-credential support.
  • hightopics#2
    Add specific topics for better categorization

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    rust, llm, api-proxy, anthropic, claude, kiro, ai, server-sent-events, token-refresh, multi-credential, load-balancing, function-calling, websearch
  • mediumreadme#3
    Add a clear English introductory sentence to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    This is a Rust-based proxy service designed to translate Anthropic Claude API requests into Kiro API requests, offering features like token refresh, multi-credential support, and load balancing.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface hank9999/kiro.rs
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
tokio-rs/tokio
Recommended in 3 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. tokio-rs/tokio · recommended 3×
  2. seanmonstar/reqwest · recommended 2×
  3. tokio-rs/tracing · recommended 2×
  4. openai-rs/openai-rust · recommended 1×
  5. google-cloud-rust/google-cloud-rust · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Seeking a Rust service to translate large language model API requests between providers.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. openai crate (openai-rs/openai-rust)
    2. google-cloud-rust (google-cloud-rust/google-cloud-rust)
    3. aws-sdk-bedrock (aws/aws-sdk-rust)
    4. LiteLLM (BerriAI/litellm)
    5. pyo3 (PyO3/pyo3)
    6. FastAPI (tiangolo/fastapi)
    7. langchain-rust (langchain-ai/langchain-rust)
    8. Axum (tokio-rs/axum)
    9. Tokio (tokio-rs/tokio)
    10. Hyper (hyperium/hyper)
    11. Tide (http-rs/tide)
    12. Actix-web (actix/actix-web)
    13. reqwest (seanmonstar/reqwest)

    AI recommended 13 alternatives but never named hank9999/kiro.rs. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to build a robust Rust AI API client with token refresh and multi-credential support?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. reqwest (seanmonstar/reqwest)
    2. tokio (tokio-rs/tokio)
    3. oauth2 (ramosbugs/oauth2-rs)
    4. serde (serde-rs/serde)
    5. serde_json (serde-rs/json)
    6. parking_lot (Amanieu/parking_lot)
    7. anyhow (dtolnay/anyhow)
    8. thiserror (dtolnay/thiserror)
    9. log (rust-lang/log)
    10. tracing (tokio-rs/tracing)
    11. tracing-subscriber (tokio-rs/tracing)
    12. tokio::time::sleep (tokio-rs/tokio)

    AI recommended 12 alternatives but never named hank9999/kiro.rs. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of hank9999/kiro.rs?
    pass
    AI named hank9999/kiro.rs explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts hank9999/kiro.rs in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named hank9999/kiro.rs explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo hank9999/kiro.rs solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named hank9999/kiro.rs explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of hank9999/kiro.rs. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/hank9999/kiro.rs.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/hank9999/kiro.rs)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/hank9999/kiro.rs"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/hank9999/kiro.rs.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

hank9999/kiro.rs — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite