RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

MichealWayne/books

Default branch master · commit c82a38e1 · scanned 5/25/2026, 3:17:51 AM

GitHub: 1,350 stars · 289 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface MichealWayne/books, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Clarify the README's H1 and opening sentence to emphasize 'e-book collection'

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # books
    前端、软件工程、AI、UED部分经典书籍免费电子版。
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # MichealWayne/books: 精选前端、软件工程、AI、UED免费电子书合集
    这是一个专注于前端开发、软件工程、人工智能和用户体验设计领域的经典书籍免费电子版合集。所有书籍均以电子版形式提供,方便开发者和学习者查阅。
  • highlicense#2
    Add a LICENSE file or clarify licensing in README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a LICENSE file in the repository root, or add a section to the README clearly stating the licensing terms for the content within the repository.
  • mediumtopics#3
    Add more specific topics related to e-book collections and learning resources

    Why:

    CURRENT
    books, frontend
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    books, frontend, ebooks, free-books, programming-books, web-development, learning-resources, software-engineering, ai, ued

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface MichealWayne/books
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
freeCodeCamp.org
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. freeCodeCamp.org · recommended 1×
  2. The Odin Project · recommended 1×
  3. MDN Web Docs · recommended 1×
  4. Google Developers Documentation · recommended 1×
  5. Smashing Magazine · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Where can I find free e-books and learning resources for modern web development?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. freeCodeCamp.org
    2. The Odin Project
    3. MDN Web Docs
    4. Google Developers Documentation
    5. Smashing Magazine
    6. Dev.to
    7. W3Schools.com

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named MichealWayne/books. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a curated collection of classic e-books on frontend development and design principles.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Don't Make Me Think, Revisited
    2. Designing with Web Standards
    3. The Elements of Typographic Style Applied to the Web
    4. A List Apart
    5. Smashing Book #1: The Definitive Guide to Web Design Trends, Techniques, and Best Practices
    6. CSS Mastery: Advanced Web Standards Solutions
    7. Information Architecture for the World Wide Web

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named MichealWayne/books. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of MichealWayne/books?
    pass
    AI named MichealWayne/books explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts MichealWayne/books in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named MichealWayne/books explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo MichealWayne/books solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name MichealWayne/books — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of MichealWayne/books. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/MichealWayne/books.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/MichealWayne/books)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/MichealWayne/books"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/MichealWayne/books.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

MichealWayne/books — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite