RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

lobehub/lobe-ui

Default branch master · commit aba5f580 · scanned 6/26/2026, 1:11:48 AM

GitHub: 2,061 stars · 252 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

3 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
27 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface lobehub/lobe-ui, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Strengthen README's opening statement to emphasize AI/LLM specialization

    Why:

    CURRENT
    Lobe UI is an open-source UI component library for building _AIGC_ web apps
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Lobe UI is an open-source UI component library **specifically designed** for building _AIGC_ web apps **and AI chatbot interfaces**.
  • mediumtopics#2
    Add more specific AI-related topics

    Why:

    CURRENT
    aigc, antd, chatbot, design-system, dumi, lobehub, react, typescript, ui, ui-components, ui-kit
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    aigc, antd, chatbot, design-system, dumi, lobehub, react, typescript, ui, ui-components, ui-kit, llm, generative-ai, ai-components
  • lowreadme#3
    Add a 'Why Lobe UI?' section to highlight core differentiators

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Add a new section, perhaps titled '✨ Why Lobe UI?', immediately after the initial description or installation section. Include bullet points like:
    - **Purpose-built for AIGC:** Unlike generic UI libraries, Lobe UI offers components and a design system optimized for AI-generated content applications and chatbot interfaces.
    - **Seamless AI Integration:** Provides ready-to-use components that simplify the development of complex AI features, such as chat histories, prompt inputs, and model configuration.
    - **Modern & Responsive Design:** Ensures a consistent, intuitive user experience across all devices for your AI applications.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface lobehub/lobe-ui
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
shadcn/ui
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. shadcn/ui · recommended 1×
  2. mui/material-ui · recommended 1×
  3. chakra-ui/chakra-ui · recommended 1×
  4. ant-design/ant-design · recommended 1×
  5. nextui-org/nextui · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What UI component library is best for building modern AI-generated content web applications?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. shadcn/ui (shadcn/ui)
    2. MUI (mui/material-ui)
    3. Chakra UI (chakra-ui/chakra-ui)
    4. Ant Design (ant-design/ant-design)
    5. NextUI (nextui-org/nextui)
    6. Radix UI (radix-ui/primitives)

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named lobehub/lobe-ui. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a React UI kit with specialized components for AI chatbot interfaces.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Botpress
    2. Chat UI
    3. React Chatbot Kit
    4. Material-UI (MUI)
    5. Ant Design

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named lobehub/lobe-ui. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of lobehub/lobe-ui?
    pass
    AI did not name lobehub/lobe-ui — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts lobehub/lobe-ui in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named lobehub/lobe-ui explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo lobehub/lobe-ui solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name lobehub/lobe-ui — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of lobehub/lobe-ui. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/lobehub/lobe-ui.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/lobehub/lobe-ui)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/lobehub/lobe-ui"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/lobehub/lobe-ui.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

lobehub/lobe-ui — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite