RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

redis-developer/ArXivChatGuru

Default branch main · commit f6ab4903 · scanned 6/14/2026, 6:37:48 AM

GitHub: 563 stars · 76 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface redis-developer/ArXivChatGuru, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README H1 and opening sentence to emphasize it's a complete application example

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # ArXiv ChatGuru
    
    ArXiv ChatGuru is a Streamlit app that turns a topic from arXiv into a topic-scoped Redis vector index.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # ArXiv ChatGuru: A complete RAG application example for chatting with academic papers
    
    ArXiv ChatGuru is a Streamlit app that demonstrates how to build a Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) system to chat with academic papers from arXiv.
  • mediumhomepage#2
    Add a homepage URL to the About section

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    [Link to a live demo or a dedicated project page/blog post about ArXiv ChatGuru]
  • lowtopics#3
    Add 'demo' and 'example-app' topics

    Why:

    CURRENT
    ai, arxiv, langchain, machine-learning, openai, python, question-answering, rag, redis, retrieval, retrieval-augmented-generation, streamlit, vector-database, vector-search
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai, arxiv, langchain, machine-learning, openai, python, question-answering, rag, redis, retrieval, retrieval-augmented-generation, streamlit, vector-database, vector-search, demo, example-app

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface redis-developer/ArXivChatGuru
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
run-llama/llama_index
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. run-llama/llama_index · recommended 1×
  2. langchain-ai/langchain · recommended 1×
  3. deepset-ai/haystack · recommended 1×
  4. facebookresearch/faiss · recommended 1×
  5. chroma-core/chroma · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to build a system to chat with academic papers?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LlamaIndex (run-llama/llama_index)
    2. LangChain (langchain-ai/langchain)
    3. Haystack (deepset-ai/haystack)
    4. Faiss (facebookresearch/faiss)
    5. Chroma (chroma-core/chroma)
    6. Weaviate (weaviate/weaviate)
    7. Hugging Face Transformers (huggingface/transformers)
    8. Sentence Transformers (UKPLab/sentence-transformers)
    9. PyPDF2 (py-pdf/pypdf)
    10. pdfminer.six (pdfminer/pdfminer.six)
    11. Streamlit (streamlit/streamlit)
    12. Gradio (gradio-app/gradio)

    AI recommended 12 alternatives but never named redis-developer/ArXivChatGuru. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Need a Python example for RAG with document embeddings and semantic search.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LlamaIndex
    2. Haystack (deepset/haystack)
    3. LangChain
    4. Sentence-Transformers
    5. FAISS
    6. Scikit-learn NearestNeighbors
    7. Gensim
    8. Scikit-learn

    AI recommended 8 alternatives but never named redis-developer/ArXivChatGuru. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of redis-developer/ArXivChatGuru?
    pass
    AI did not name redis-developer/ArXivChatGuru — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts redis-developer/ArXivChatGuru in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named redis-developer/ArXivChatGuru explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo redis-developer/ArXivChatGuru solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named redis-developer/ArXivChatGuru explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of redis-developer/ArXivChatGuru. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/redis-developer/ArXivChatGuru.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/redis-developer/ArXivChatGuru)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/redis-developer/ArXivChatGuru"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/redis-developer/ArXivChatGuru.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

redis-developer/ArXivChatGuru — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite