RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

logancyang/obsidian-copilot

Default branch master · commit 632c1e81 · scanned 6/30/2026, 12:36:55 AM

GitHub: 7,316 stars · 680 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
33 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
2 pass · 0 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface logancyang/obsidian-copilot, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition README H1/H2 to clearly state identity and core value

    Why:

    CURRENT
    <h1 align="center">Copilot for Obsidian</h1>
    <h2 align="center">The Ultimate AI Assistant for Your Second Brain</h2>
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    <h1 align="center">logancyang/obsidian-copilot: Your Private, In-Vault AI Assistant</h1>
    <h2 align="center">The Ultimate AI Assistant for Your Second Brain, with Local Data Control and LLM Flexibility</h2>
  • highabout#2
    Update the repository's 'About' description for clarity and differentiation

    Why:

    CURRENT
    THE Copilot in Obsidian
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    An in-vault AI assistant for Obsidian, offering chat-based interaction, web support, and agentic capabilities while ensuring your data remains local and private, with flexible LLM choices including local models.
  • mediumtopics#3
    Expand repository topics to include specific differentiators

    Why:

    CURRENT
    ai, aiagent, chatgpt, copilot, obsidian-plugin
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    obsidian-plugin, ai, llm, local-llm, data-privacy, knowledge-management, second-brain, ai-assistant, chat-ai

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface logancyang/obsidian-copilot
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Smart Connections
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Smart Connections · recommended 2×
  2. Text Generator · recommended 2×
  3. Obsidian BMO Chatbot · recommended 1×
  4. Obsidian Copilot · recommended 1×
  5. Obsidian LLM Research Assistant · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are the best AI plugins for Obsidian that offer chat-based interaction with my notes?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Smart Connections
    2. Text Generator
    3. Obsidian BMO Chatbot
    4. Obsidian Copilot
    5. Obsidian LLM Research Assistant

    AI recommended 5 alternatives but never named logancyang/obsidian-copilot. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    I need an AI assistant for my personal notes that keeps all data locally and private.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Obsidian
    2. Smart Connections
    3. Text Generator
    4. Local GPT
    5. LM Studio
    6. Ollama
    7. Logseq
    8. Logseq GPT3 OpenAI
    9. Joplin
    10. Note overview
    11. VS Code
    12. Sublime Text
    13. PrivateGPT
    14. Mem

    AI recommended 14 alternatives but never named logancyang/obsidian-copilot. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    pass

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of logancyang/obsidian-copilot?
    pass
    AI did not name logancyang/obsidian-copilot — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts logancyang/obsidian-copilot in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named logancyang/obsidian-copilot explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo logancyang/obsidian-copilot solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named logancyang/obsidian-copilot explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of logancyang/obsidian-copilot. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/logancyang/obsidian-copilot.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/logancyang/obsidian-copilot)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/logancyang/obsidian-copilot"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/logancyang/obsidian-copilot.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

logancyang/obsidian-copilot — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite