RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

princeton-nlp/LM-BFF

Default branch main · commit c282f521 · scanned 5/31/2026, 9:08:20 PM

GitHub: 727 stars · 131 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
35 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface princeton-nlp/LM-BFF, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README H1 and opening paragraph to clarify its PEFT methodology

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # LM-BFF (**B**etter **F**ew-shot **F**ine-tuning of **L**anguage **M**odels)
    
    This is the implementation of the paper Making Pre-trained Language Models Better Few-shot Learners. LM-BFF is short for **b**etter **f**ew-shot **f**ine-tuning of **l**anguage **m**odels.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # LM-BFF: Parameter-Efficient Few-shot Fine-tuning of Language Models
    
    This is the official implementation of the ACL 2021 paper "Making Pre-trained Language Models Better Few-shot Learners" (https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.15723). LM-BFF (Better Few-shot Fine-tuning of Language Models) introduces a suite of simple and complementary parameter-efficient techniques for fine-tuning pre-trained language models on a small number of training examples, including prompt-based fine-tuning and refined in-context demonstrations.
  • mediumhomepage#2
    Add the arXiv paper link as the repository homepage

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.15723
  • lowtopics#3
    Expand repository topics to include related NLP and PEFT terms

    Why:

    CURRENT
    few-shot-learning, language-models, lm-bff
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    few-shot-learning, language-models, lm-bff, prompt-tuning, parameter-efficient-fine-tuning, peft, nlp, deep-learning

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface princeton-nlp/LM-BFF
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
LoRA
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. LoRA · recommended 2×
  2. Prompt Tuning · recommended 2×
  3. QLoRA · recommended 1×
  4. P-tuning v2 · recommended 1×
  5. AdapterHub · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I fine-tune pre-trained language models effectively with minimal training data?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LoRA
    2. QLoRA
    3. Prompt Tuning
    4. P-tuning v2
    5. AdapterHub
    6. NLTK
    7. spaCy
    8. Word2Vec
    9. GloVe
    10. GPT-4
    11. Claude 3
    12. Hugging Face Transformers Library
    13. BERT
    14. RoBERTa
    15. GPT-2
    16. Llama 2
    17. Mistral
    18. BioBERT
    19. PubMedBERT
    20. Hugging Face PEFT Library
    21. bitsandbytes
    22. Google Translate API
    23. LibreTranslate
    24. OpenAI API
    25. Anthropic API
    26. Google Gemini API
    27. Weights & Biases (W&B)
    28. MLflow

    AI recommended 28 alternatives but never named princeton-nlp/LM-BFF. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What techniques exist for enhancing few-shot learning capabilities of large language models?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. FLAN
    2. T0
    3. LoRA
    4. Prefix-Tuning
    5. Prompt Tuning
    6. MAML
    7. Reptile
    8. REALM
    9. Dense Passage Retrieval (DPR)

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named princeton-nlp/LM-BFF. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of princeton-nlp/LM-BFF?
    pass
    AI named princeton-nlp/LM-BFF explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts princeton-nlp/LM-BFF in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named princeton-nlp/LM-BFF explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo princeton-nlp/LM-BFF solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named princeton-nlp/LM-BFF explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of princeton-nlp/LM-BFF. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/princeton-nlp/LM-BFF.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/princeton-nlp/LM-BFF)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/princeton-nlp/LM-BFF"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/princeton-nlp/LM-BFF.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

princeton-nlp/LM-BFF — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite