RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

espressif/esp-brookesia

Default branch master · commit 02d1db90 · scanned 6/10/2026, 10:42:14 AM

GitHub: 711 stars · 182 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
28 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
2 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface espressif/esp-brookesia, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Add a concise tagline under the main README heading

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # ESP-Brookesia
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # ESP-Brookesia

A full-stack framework for Human-Machine Interaction (HMI) and AI integration on ESP-IDF AIoT devices.
  • hightopics#2
    Add relevant topics to the repository

    Why:

    CURRENT
    (none)
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    aiot, hmi, human-machine-interaction, ai-integration, esp-idf, embedded, framework, iot, espressif
  • mediumreadme#3
    Add a 'Project Status' section to the README

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ## Project Status

[Add a clear statement here about the project's current status, e.g., production readiness, stability, support level, and target use cases.]

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface espressif/esp-brookesia
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
LVGL
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. LVGL · recommended 1×
  2. TouchGFX · recommended 1×
  3. Qt · recommended 1×
  4. Flutter · recommended 1×
  5. MicroPython · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What frameworks simplify human-machine interaction and AI integration for embedded IoT devices?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LVGL
    2. TouchGFX
    3. Qt
    4. Flutter
    5. MicroPython
    6. CircuitPython
    7. Edge Impulse

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named espressif/esp-brookesia. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for a C/C++ full-stack framework for AIoT device application development.
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Zephyr Project
    2. Mbed OS
    3. ESP-IDF
    4. Azure RTOS
    5. FreeRTOS
    6. RIOT

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named espressif/esp-brookesia. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of espressif/esp-brookesia?
    pass
    AI named espressif/esp-brookesia explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts espressif/esp-brookesia in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named espressif/esp-brookesia explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo espressif/esp-brookesia solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name espressif/esp-brookesia — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of espressif/esp-brookesia. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/espressif/esp-brookesia.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/espressif/esp-brookesia)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/espressif/esp-brookesia"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/espressif/esp-brookesia.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

espressif/esp-brookesia — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite