RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

RomanHotsiy/commitgpt

Default branch main · commit dfbe1eb2 · scanned 6/28/2026, 8:52:48 PM

GitHub: 1,595 stars · 92 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
54 /100
Needs work
Category recall
2 / 2
Avg rank #6.0 when recommended
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface RomanHotsiy/commitgpt, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highlicense#1
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a LICENSE file (e.g., MIT, Apache-2.0) in the repository root to clearly state the terms of use.
  • mediumreadme#2
    Strengthen the README's opening to emphasize AI-powered generation

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # commitgpt

Automatically generate commit messages using ChatGPT.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # commitgpt

An AI-powered CLI tool to automatically generate conventional commit messages using ChatGPT, based on your staged git changes.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
2 / 2
100% of queries surface RomanHotsiy/commitgpt
Avg rank
#6.0
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
14%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
commitizen/cz-cli
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. commitizen/cz-cli · recommended 1×
  2. conventional-changelog/commitlint · recommended 1×
  3. streamich/git-cz · recommended 1×
  4. vivaxy/vscode-conventional-commits · recommended 1×
  5. mshumer/commitai · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to automatically generate conventional commit messages from my staged git changes?
    you: #5
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Commitizen CLI (commitizen/cz-cli)
    2. Commitlint (conventional-changelog/commitlint)
    3. Git-cz (streamich/git-cz)
    4. Conventional Commits VS Code Extension (vivaxy/vscode-conventional-commits)
    5. CommitGPT (Nutlope/commitgpt) ← you
    6. CommitAI (mshumer/commitai)
    7. LazyGit (jesseduffield/lazygit)
    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    Looking for an AI-powered CLI tool to suggest git commit messages based on code diffs.
    you: #7
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Commitizen
    2. cz-conventional-commits-ai
    3. cz-gpt
    4. Git Commit AI
    5. OpenCommit
    6. Aicommit
    7. CommitGPT ← you
    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of RomanHotsiy/commitgpt?
    pass
    AI did not name RomanHotsiy/commitgpt — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts RomanHotsiy/commitgpt in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named RomanHotsiy/commitgpt explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo RomanHotsiy/commitgpt solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name RomanHotsiy/commitgpt — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of RomanHotsiy/commitgpt. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/RomanHotsiy/commitgpt.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/RomanHotsiy/commitgpt)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/RomanHotsiy/commitgpt"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/RomanHotsiy/commitgpt.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

RomanHotsiy/commitgpt — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite