RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

RomanHotsiy/commitgpt

Default branch main · commit dfbe1eb2 · scanned 5/17/2026, 4:12:40 PM

GitHub: 1,595 stars · 92 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
30 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface RomanHotsiy/commitgpt, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highlicense#1
    Add a standard open-source license file

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a LICENSE file in the repository root, for example, with the MIT License text, to clearly state the terms of use.
  • mediumreadme#2
    Enhance the README's main heading and description for clarity

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # commitgpt

Automatically generate commit messages using ChatGPT.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # commitgpt: AI-powered CLI for automatic commit messages

Automatically generate conventional commit messages using ChatGPT directly from your Git diffs.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface RomanHotsiy/commitgpt
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
commitizen/cz-cli
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. commitizen/cz-cli · recommended 1×
  2. commitizen/cz-conventional-changelog · recommended 1×
  3. typicode/husky · recommended 1×
  4. conventional-changelog/commitlint · recommended 1×
  5. Conventional Commits (VS Code Extension) · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I automatically generate conventional commit messages for my Git changes?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Commitizen CLI (commitizen/cz-cli)
    2. cz-conventional-changelog (commitizen/cz-conventional-changelog)
    3. Husky (typicode/husky)
    4. commitlint (conventional-changelog/commitlint)
    5. Conventional Commits (VS Code Extension)
    6. GitLens (gitkraken/vscode-gitlens)
    7. commitizen-go (go-commitizen/go-commitizen)
    8. GitHub Copilot
    9. ChatGPT

    AI recommended 9 alternatives but never named RomanHotsiy/commitgpt. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What tools use AI to suggest descriptive commit messages from Git diffs?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GitHub Copilot CLI
    2. GitSense
    3. Commitizen
    4. cz-git
    5. AI Commit
    6. LazyGit
    7. Sourcegraph Cody

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named RomanHotsiy/commitgpt. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of RomanHotsiy/commitgpt?
    pass
    AI named RomanHotsiy/commitgpt explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts RomanHotsiy/commitgpt in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named RomanHotsiy/commitgpt explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo RomanHotsiy/commitgpt solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named RomanHotsiy/commitgpt explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of RomanHotsiy/commitgpt. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/RomanHotsiy/commitgpt.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/RomanHotsiy/commitgpt)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/RomanHotsiy/commitgpt"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/RomanHotsiy/commitgpt.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

RomanHotsiy/commitgpt — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite