RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

cursor/plugins

Default branch main · commit c8402bc8 · scanned 5/31/2026, 5:02:57 PM

GitHub: 1,593 stars · 127 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
30 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface cursor/plugins, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highreadme#1
    Reposition the README H1 to specify the target platform

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # Cursor plugins

Official Cursor plugins for popular developer tools, frameworks, and SaaS products.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # Cursor plugins

Official plugins for the Cursor AI code editor, extending its functionality for popular developer tools, frameworks, and SaaS products.
  • hightopics#2
    Add relevant topics to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    ai-coding-assistant, cursor-ide, plugins, extensions, developer-tools, code-review, agent-orchestration
  • highlicense#3
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a `LICENSE` file in the repository root containing the text of a standard open-source license, such as MIT or Apache-2.0.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface cursor/plugins
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
LangChain
Recommended in 1 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. LangChain · recommended 1×
  2. LlamaIndex · recommended 1×
  3. OpenAI Function Calling · recommended 1×
  4. Microsoft Semantic Kernel · recommended 1×
  5. Haystack · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I extend my AI coding assistant with custom tools and integrations for specific development tasks?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. LlamaIndex
    3. OpenAI Function Calling
    4. Microsoft Semantic Kernel
    5. Haystack
    6. CrewAI
    7. AutoGPT

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named cursor/plugins. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What advanced code review tools offer deep security audits and enforce strict code quality standards?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. SonarQube (SonarSource/sonarqube)
    2. Checkmarx SAST
    3. Fortify Static Code Analyzer
    4. Veracode Static Analysis
    5. CodeQL (github/codeql)
    6. Coverity

    AI recommended 6 alternatives but never named cursor/plugins. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of cursor/plugins?
    pass
    AI named cursor/plugins explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts cursor/plugins in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named cursor/plugins explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo cursor/plugins solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named cursor/plugins explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of cursor/plugins. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/cursor/plugins.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/cursor/plugins)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/cursor/plugins"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/cursor/plugins.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

cursor/plugins — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite