RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

cursor/plugins

Default branch main · commit 0452e08a · scanned 6/30/2026, 5:08:00 PM

GitHub: 2,186 stars · 169 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

3 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
30 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 0 warn · 1 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
3 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface cursor/plugins, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • hightopics#1
    Add specific topics to categorize the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    cursor-editor, ai-coding-assistant, plugins, extensions, developer-tools, code-review, workflow-automation
  • highreadme#2
    Reposition the README's opening sentence to specify the Cursor editor

    Why:

    CURRENT
    # Cursor plugins

Official Cursor plugins for popular developer tools, frameworks, and SaaS products.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    # Cursor plugins

Official plugins that extend the Cursor AI code editor, integrating core AI features with popular developer tools, frameworks, and SaaS products.
  • mediumlicense#3
    Add a LICENSE file to the repository root

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    Create a LICENSE file (e.g., MIT or Apache-2.0) in the repository root to clarify usage rights.

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface cursor/plugins
Avg rank
—
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
OpenAI API
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. OpenAI API · recommended 2×
  2. LangChain · recommended 1×
  3. LlamaIndex · recommended 1×
  4. Anthropic Claude · recommended 1×
  5. Google Gemini · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How can I extend my AI coding assistant with custom features and integrations?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. LangChain
    2. LlamaIndex
    3. OpenAI API
    4. Anthropic Claude
    5. Google Gemini
    6. Hugging Face Transformers
    7. FastAPI
    8. Flask
    9. Docker
    10. Kubernetes

    AI recommended 10 alternatives but never named cursor/plugins. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are the best tools for automating code review and team workflows in an AI development environment?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. GitHub Actions
    2. CodeQL
    3. OpenAI API
    4. Claude
    5. Llama 2
    6. GitLab CI/CD
    7. Azure DevOps Pipelines
    8. Azure Code Analysis
    9. Visual Studio
    10. Azure Machine Learning
    11. CircleCI
    12. SonarQube
    13. ast
    14. pylint
    15. Review Board
    16. Phabricator
    17. Differential
    18. Herald

    AI recommended 18 alternatives but never named cursor/plugins. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    fail

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of cursor/plugins?
    pass
    AI named cursor/plugins explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts cursor/plugins in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named cursor/plugins explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo cursor/plugins solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI named cursor/plugins explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of cursor/plugins. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/cursor/plugins.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/cursor/plugins)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/cursor/plugins"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/cursor/plugins.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

cursor/plugins — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite