REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

yzhao062/cs-paper-checklist

Default branch main · commit 7820bca0 · scanned 6/19/2026, 5:58:39 PM

GitHub: 1,585 stars · 145 forks

Scan history for this repo

Score trend below includes all ready runs (older left, newer right; scroll horizontally if needed). The table is collapsed by default—expand for newest-first rows, 10 per page.

Score trend (left → right: older → newer)

2 ready scans. Expand the table below for newest-first rows (10 per page, paginated).

AI VISIBILITY SCORE

22 /100

Critical

Category recall

0 / 2

Not recommended in any query

Rule findings

1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail

Objective metadata checks

AI knows your name

1 / 3

Direct prompts that named your repo

HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface yzhao062/cs-paper-checklist, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

3 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION

hightopics#1

Add relevant topics to improve categorization

Why:

COPY-PASTE FIX

academic-writing, computer-science, research-paper, checklist, scientific-writing, phd-student, conference-submission, paper-writing-guide

highreadme#2

Clarify repo's nature as a guide, not a tool, in README intro

Why:

CURRENT

_This checklist is a practical, opinionated guide for sanity-checking the writing quality, structure, and presentation of CS papers—especially for conference (and journal) submissions. While some items are subjective, the goal is to provide concrete reminders and highlight common pitfalls. It is a living document and will continue to be updated based on feedback._

COPY-PASTE FIX

_This repository offers a comprehensive, actionable **checklist and guide** for Computer Science researchers, students, and reviewers, specifically designed to sanity-check the writing quality, structure, and presentation of academic papers for conference and journal submissions. Unlike software tools or editors, this is a living document providing concrete reminders and highlighting common pitfalls to help your paper get accepted, not desk rejected._

mediumhomepage#3
Add a homepage URL
Why:
COPY-PASTE FIX
```
https://github.com/yzhao062/cs-paper-checklist#readme
```

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall

0 / 2

0% of queries surface yzhao062/cs-paper-checklist

Avg rank

—

Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.

Share of voice

Of all named tools, what % are you?

Top rival

Grammarly

Recommended in 1 of 2 queries

COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD

Grammarly · recommended 1×
Overleaf · recommended 1×
TeXstudio · recommended 1×
VS Code · recommended 1×
LaTeX Workshop · recommended 1×

CATEGORY QUERY
How to improve my computer science paper's quality for conference submission?
you: not recommended
AI recommended (in order):
1. Grammarly
2. Overleaf
3. TeXstudio
4. VS Code
5. LaTeX Workshop
6. Hemingway Editor
7. GitHub
8. GitLab
9. Jupyter Notebooks
10. R Markdown
11. Docker
12. Matplotlib
13. Seaborn
14. ggplot2
15. Inkscape
16. Adobe Illustrator
17. Affinity Designer
18. Microsoft PowerPoint
19. Google Slides
20. Zotero
21. Mendeley
22. BibTeX
23. Google Scholar
24. ACM Digital Library
25. IEEE Xplore
AI recommended 25 alternatives but never named yzhao062/cs-paper-checklist. This is the gap to close.
Show full AI answer
CATEGORY QUERY
What are common pitfalls in academic writing for computer science research papers?
you: not recommended
Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

Metadata completeness
warn
Suggestion:
README presence
pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of yzhao062/cs-paper-checklist?
pass
AI did not name yzhao062/cs-paper-checklist — likely talking about a different project
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
If a team adopts yzhao062/cs-paper-checklist in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
pass
AI named yzhao062/cs-paper-checklist explicitly
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?
In one sentence, what problem does the repo yzhao062/cs-paper-checklist solve, and who is the primary audience?
pass
AI did not name yzhao062/cs-paper-checklist — likely talking about a different project
AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of yzhao062/cs-paper-checklist. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

Live preview

MARKDOWN (README)

[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/yzhao062/cs-paper-checklist.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/yzhao062/cs-paper-checklist)

HTML

<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/yzhao062/cs-paper-checklist"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/yzhao062/cs-paper-checklist.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>

Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

yzhao062/cs-paper-checklist — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

Deep reports10 / month
Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite