RRepoGEO

REPOGEO REPORT · LITE

yzhao062/cs-paper-checklist

Default branch main · commit 2b642255 · scanned 5/9/2026, 8:33:13 PM

GitHub: 1,564 stars · 144 forks

AI VISIBILITY SCORE
22 /100
Critical
Category recall
0 / 2
Not recommended in any query
Rule findings
1 pass · 1 warn · 0 fail
Objective metadata checks
AI knows your name
1 / 3
Direct prompts that named your repo
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

Action plan is what to do next — copy-pasteable changes prioritized by impact. Category visibility is the real GEO test: when a user asks an AI a brand-free question that should surface yzhao062/cs-paper-checklist, does the AI actually recommend you — or your competitors? Objective checks verify the metadata signals AI engines weight first. Self-mention check detects whether AI even knows you exist by name.

Action plan — copy-paste fixes

2 prioritized changes generated by gemini-2.5-flash. Mark items done after you ship the fix.

OVERALL DIRECTION
  • highabout#1
    Clarify repository description to emphasize its nature as a guide, not a tool

    Why:

    CURRENT
    A final sanity checklist to help your CS paper get accepted, not desk rejected.
    COPY-PASTE FIX
    A comprehensive, opinionated checklist and guide for computer science researchers to ensure high-quality writing, structure, and presentation for conference and journal paper submissions.
  • mediumhomepage#2
    Add a homepage URL to the repository

    Why:

    COPY-PASTE FIX
    https://github.com/yzhao062/cs-paper-checklist

Category GEO backends resolved for this scan: google/gemini-2.5-flash, deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash

Category visibility — the real GEO test

Brand-free queries asked to google/gemini-2.5-flash. Did AI recommend you, or someone else?

Same questions for every model — switch tabs to compare answers and rankings.

Recall
0 / 2
0% of queries surface yzhao062/cs-paper-checklist
Avg rank
Lower is better. #1 = top recommendation.
Share of voice
0%
Of all named tools, what % are you?
Top rival
Overleaf
Recommended in 2 of 2 queries
COMPETITOR LEADERBOARD
  1. Overleaf · recommended 2×
  2. Grammarly · recommended 2×
  3. Zotero · recommended 1×
  4. Mendeley · recommended 1×
  5. ChatGPT · recommended 1×
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    How to ensure my computer science paper meets submission quality standards?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Overleaf
    2. Grammarly
    3. Zotero
    4. Mendeley
    5. ChatGPT
    6. Google Gemini
    7. arXiv

    AI recommended 7 alternatives but never named yzhao062/cs-paper-checklist. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer
  • CATEGORY QUERY
    What are common pitfalls to avoid when writing a research paper for conferences?
    you: not recommended
    AI recommended (in order):
    1. Grammarly
    2. ProWritingAid
    3. Overleaf
    4. R
    5. Python
    6. SciPy
    7. NumPy
    8. Pandas
    9. Matplotlib
    10. Seaborn

    AI recommended 10 alternatives but never named yzhao062/cs-paper-checklist. This is the gap to close.

    Show full AI answer

Objective checks

Rule-based audits of metadata signals AI engines weight most.

  • Metadata completeness
    warn

    Suggestion:

  • README presence
    pass

Self-mention check

Does AI even know your repo exists when asked about it directly?

  • Compared to common alternatives in this category, what is the core differentiator of yzhao062/cs-paper-checklist?
    pass
    AI did not name yzhao062/cs-paper-checklist — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • If a team adopts yzhao062/cs-paper-checklist in production, what risks or prerequisites should they evaluate first?
    pass
    AI named yzhao062/cs-paper-checklist explicitly

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

  • In one sentence, what problem does the repo yzhao062/cs-paper-checklist solve, and who is the primary audience?
    pass
    AI did not name yzhao062/cs-paper-checklist — likely talking about a different project

    AI answers can be confidently wrong. Read for accuracy: does it match your actual tech stack, audience, and differentiator?

Embed your GEO score

Drop this badge into the README of yzhao062/cs-paper-checklist. It auto-updates whenever the report is rescanned and links back to the latest report — easy public proof that you care about AI discoverability.

RepoGEO badge previewLive preview
MARKDOWN (README)
[![RepoGEO](https://repogeo.com/badge/yzhao062/cs-paper-checklist.svg)](https://repogeo.com/en/r/yzhao062/cs-paper-checklist)
HTML
<a href="https://repogeo.com/en/r/yzhao062/cs-paper-checklist"><img src="https://repogeo.com/badge/yzhao062/cs-paper-checklist.svg" alt="RepoGEO" /></a>
Pro

Subscribe to Pro for deep diagnoses

yzhao062/cs-paper-checklist — Lite scans stay free; this card itemizes Pro deep limits vs Lite.

  • Deep reports10 / month
  • Brand-free category queries5 vs 2 in Lite
  • Prioritized action items8 vs 3 in Lite